1978
Human Pharmacology and Abuse Potential of the Analgesic Buprenorphine
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
673
90
42
4
Citation Types
15
392
3
2
Year Published
1976
2026
Publication Types
Select...
625
142
12
6
Relationship
3
782
Authors
Journals
Cited by 785 publications
(412 citation statements)
References 25 publications
15
392
3
2
“…In general, buprenorphine appeared to produce a relatively mild withdrawal syndrome compared to the withdrawal expected following detoxification using methadone or clonidine. This is consistent with the literature on buprenorphine withdrawal (Bickel et al, 1988a; Bullingham et al, 1980; Fudala et al, 1990; Hambrook and Rance, 1976; Jasinski et al, 1978). Review of these studies suggests several potential areas for future research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In general, buprenorphine appeared to produce a relatively mild withdrawal syndrome compared to the withdrawal expected following detoxification using methadone or clonidine. This is consistent with the literature on buprenorphine withdrawal (Bickel et al, 1988a; Bullingham et al, 1980; Fudala et al, 1990; Hambrook and Rance, 1976; Jasinski et al, 1978). Review of these studies suggests several potential areas for future research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They also seemed to tolerate their withdrawal symptoms well. This experience agrees with the observation of Jasinski et al [4]. Sleep disturbances occurred rarely: Patients reported in 20% (n = 7) that they had sleeping problems that persisted for more than 2 nights.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Both preparations produced mild to moderate increases in positive subject ratings, indicating some abuse potential. However, the finding in this study of a relatively flat dose-response function and a slow time to peak effect in response to SL administration are features consistent with findings in other studies, and suggests a lower abuse potential of both buprenorphine and buprenorphine/naloxone when given sublingually compared to parenteral administration (Jasinski et al 1978, Lewis 1985, Weinhold et al 1992, Comer and Collins 2002). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
