Human factors in resuscitation teaching

Norris, Elizabeth; Lockey, Andrew

doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.11.001

Cited by 72 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Evidence supports that teams who understand and delegate roles and responsibilities in an effective manner produce improved patient outcomes (Freeth et al . , Norris & Lockey , Brock et al . ).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Medical‐surgical nurses' experiences as first responders during deterioration events: a qualitative study

Hart

Spiva

Dolly

et al. 2016

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Medical‐surgical nurses' experiences as first responders during deterioration events: a qualitative study

Hart

Spiva

Dolly

et al. 2016

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Earlier studies pointed out that the implementation of CRM in health care can lead to a reduction in mortality and in resuscitations (Ballangrud, Persenius, Hedelin, & Hall-Lord, 2014;K€ unzle, Kolbe, & Grote, 2010;McCaughey & Traynor, 2010). Nevertheless, during CPR classes in nursing education, the focus is primarily on technical skills and knowledge and CRM principles get little attention (Norris & Lockey, 2012).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effectiveness of crisis resource management and team debriefing in resuscitation education of nursing students: A randomised controlled trial

MSc

Verhaeghe

Hecke

2017

Journal of Clinical Nursing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aims and objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate (i) whether integrating a course on crisis resource management principles and team debriefings in simulation training, increases self-efficacy, team efficacy and technical skills of nursing students in resuscitation settings and (ii) which phases contribute the most to these outcomes.Background: Crisis resource management principles have been introduced in health care

show abstract

“…Difficulty finding equipment leads to members of staff being sent away to hunt elsewhere, leads to delays in delivery of care, may increase stress levels amongst team members, and may increase the rates of error and adverse events. This is on top of the emergency situation itself causing stress, which can affect performance, as discussed by Norris and Lockey 21 . Importantly, Sandroni et al, 22 noted that even resuscitation courses lead to stress that causes indecision and delay.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The “Resus:Station”: The use of clinical simulations in a randomised crossover study to evaluate a novel resuscitation trolley

et al. 2012

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background and aim Inadequately designed equipment has been implicated in poor efficiency and critical incidents associated with resuscitation. A novel resuscitation trolley (Resus:Station) was designed and evaluated for impact on team efficiency, user opinion, and teamwork, compared with the standard trolley, in simulated cardiac arrest scenarios. Methods Fifteen experienced cardiac arrest teams were recruited (45 participants). Teams performed recorded resuscitation simulations using new and conventional trolleys, with order of use randomised. After each simulation, efficiency (“time to drugs”, un-locatable equipment, unnecessary drawer opening) and team performance (OSCAR) were assessed from the video recordings and participants were asked to complete questionnaires scoring various aspects of the trolley on a Likert scale. Results Time to locate the drugs was significantly faster ( p = 0.001) when using the Resus:Station (mean 5.19 s (SD 3.34)) than when using the standard trolley (26.81 s (SD16.05)). There were no reports of missing equipment when using the Resus:Station. However, during four of the fifteen study sessions using the standard trolley participants were unable to find equipment, with an average of 6.75 unnecessary drawer openings per simulation. User feedback results clearly indicated a highly significant preference for the newly designed Resus:Station for all aspects. Teams performed equally well for all dimensions of team performance using both trolleys, despite it being their first exposure to the Resus:Station. Conclusion We conclude that in this simulated environment, the new design of trolley is safe to use, and has the potential to improve efficiency at a resuscitation attempt.

show abstract

Human factors in resuscitation teaching

Cited by 72 publications

References 29 publications

Medical‐surgical nurses' experiences as first responders during deterioration events: a qualitative study

Medical‐surgical nurses' experiences as first responders during deterioration events: a qualitative study

The effectiveness of crisis resource management and team debriefing in resuscitation education of nursing students: A randomised controlled trial

The “Resus:Station”: The use of clinical simulations in a randomised crossover study to evaluate a novel resuscitation trolley

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About