2019
DOI: 10.1017/s003060531800128x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human–elephant interactions in areas surrounding the Rungwa, Kizigo, and Muhesi Game Reserves, central Tanzania

Abstract: This study assesses the patterns of crop damage by elephants Loxodonta africana in areas adjacent to the Rungwa, Kizigo and Muhesi Game Reserves in Tanzania. We used a questionnaire survey to collect data from a total of 210 household heads from seven villages, with 30 household heads in each village, during June–August 2015. Proximity was a significant factor influencing losses, with crop farms within < 1 km from the reserves having higher losses, followed by those 1–5 km and > 5 km distant. Most househ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In all cases, the intersections were carried out so that the classified conflict areas were either adjacent to, or within a distance of 10 km from, the edge of the extended range map layer. We set this distance to consider the wide-ranging behaviour of both lions and elephants, to account for the fact that conflict decreases at greater distances from protected area boundaries 37 , 38 , and to account for the fact that future human pressures will likely increase before conservation actions take place 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In all cases, the intersections were carried out so that the classified conflict areas were either adjacent to, or within a distance of 10 km from, the edge of the extended range map layer. We set this distance to consider the wide-ranging behaviour of both lions and elephants, to account for the fact that conflict decreases at greater distances from protected area boundaries 37 , 38 , and to account for the fact that future human pressures will likely increase before conservation actions take place 2 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis combines the most up-to-date information on the distribution of lions and elephants with spatial information on human population density, cropland, and cattle density, as these are considered to be the major drivers of human–wildlife conflict in Africa 4 , 8 . Conflict decreases with distance from protected areas 37 , 38 ; thus, we identify areas on the perimeter of the ranges of lions and elephants that are within 10 km of the highest densities of humans, cattle, and crops. To avoid interrupting ecological processes such as migrations and/or causing unintended consequences to other biodiversity (e.g., habitat fragmentation), we extended the species ranges to include adjacent protected areas that currently lack lions and elephants, but were once part of their historical distribution (Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The savannah has been affected by increased human activity and has experienced a rapid agricultural expansion over the last two decades. This has led to the disruption of the migratory corridor [42] and the shrinking of habitat for species with large home ranges, such as African elephants, thus resulting in human-wildlife conflicts [54].…”
Section: Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased disturbance at the edges of PAs reflects the high potential for humanwildlife conflicts. Areas adjacent to the border should be considered less desirable by agro-pastoralists because of severe human-wildlife conflicts [43,54], which account for crop losses as well as livestock and human deaths. In contrast, we observed an increase in human activities close to the border of the RMKGR.…”
Section: Relationship Between Vegetation Disturbance and Wildlife Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation