2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-014-9926-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human Dimensions of Our Estuaries and Coasts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within marine and coastal habitats, the term "ecosystem services" describes the provision of goods and amenities, such as food and raw materials, and numerous other environmental, economic, and sociocultural services (Yoskowitz and Russell 2015, Daily, 1997and Costanza et al, 1997. Through the use of valuation techniques, approximations of the monetary value of ecosystem services are gaining preeminence in biodiversity conservation arenas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within marine and coastal habitats, the term "ecosystem services" describes the provision of goods and amenities, such as food and raw materials, and numerous other environmental, economic, and sociocultural services (Yoskowitz and Russell 2015, Daily, 1997and Costanza et al, 1997. Through the use of valuation techniques, approximations of the monetary value of ecosystem services are gaining preeminence in biodiversity conservation arenas.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the benefits produced by the spatial connectivity to fishing stocks through the spillover effect (Samonte et al, 2016). In addition, ecosystem services approaches have yet to make a stronger and more effective connection to human and societal well-being (Yoskowitz and Russell, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the FEGS classification excludes the ‘intermediate service’ of primary production and wood is identified as the only FEGS for which there may be multiple users and associated values. A final benefit of the FEGS classification for aquatic conservation is the extension that maps service flows to end‐users (http://www.epa.gov/research/ecoscience/eco-negscs.htm), providing policy‐makers with a tool to gauge different impacts to human well‐being resulting from different environmental management options (Yoskowitz and Russell, ).…”
Section: Classifying Aquatic Ecosystem Services For Habitat Conservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coastal communities' ability to respond to and mitigate these impacts in order to maintain a reliable quantity and quality of ecosystem services represents a critical feedback mechanism necessary for the resilience of social-ecological systems. Concepts such as ecosystem services and social-ecological systems are increasingly being used to translate many of these complex interactions into frameworks and models that describe the organization and management of natural resources (Yoskowitz and Russell 2015, Biggs 2015, Collins et al 2011. A social-ecological systems approach (Berkes and Folke 1998) requires researchers across diverse social and ecological disciplines to engage in integrated assessments to resolve natural resource management problems (Carpenter and Gunderson 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%