Encyclopedia of Biometrics 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-7488-4_2261
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Human-Biometric Sensor Interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HBSI framework [3], devised by Purdue University, provides a set of interaction metrics to reach a thorough understanding of how users interact with biometric system and its impact on the biometric performance. The HBSI model is formed of three elements: human (the participants of this experiment), sensor (either the front camera or the microphone of the smartphone) and biometric system (the PIDaaS platform).…”
Section: Biometric Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HBSI framework [3], devised by Purdue University, provides a set of interaction metrics to reach a thorough understanding of how users interact with biometric system and its impact on the biometric performance. The HBSI model is formed of three elements: human (the participants of this experiment), sensor (either the front camera or the microphone of the smartphone) and biometric system (the PIDaaS platform).…”
Section: Biometric Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to perform such as analysis, the HBSI framework [2] devised at the Purdue University has been applied. The HBSI framework proposes interaction metrics to reach a deeper understanding of commonly used biometric performance metrics such as Failure to Enrol (FTE) or Failure to Acquire (FTA) [3].…”
Section: Biometric Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The HBSI presentation metrics are defined by the type of presentations the users make, and their categorisation depends on whether the user makes a correct or incorrect presentation, whether the presentation was detected by the biometric system and whether the presentation was correctly classified by the biometric system [2]. Taking into account these three factors the presentations are classified as unsuccessful interactions: Defective Interaction (DI), Failure to Detect (FTD), Concealed Interaction (CI), Failure to Process (FTP), False Interaction (FI); or as a successful interaction: Successfully Processed Sample (SPS) (see Figure 2).…”
Section: Biometric Interaction Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations