Advances in Sound Localization 2011
DOI: 10.5772/14773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

HRTF Sound Localization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To develop our implementation of both of these methods, we tested using the same HRTF dataset that the authors in both papers used to obtain results [19]. Our implementation of the cross-convolution method produced similar results to those reported in [18,9] using speech sounds. For the Speech Prefilter method, we found that the performance of our implementation of this method was strongly dependent on the specific speech utterance used.…”
Section: Polar Angle Estimationmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To develop our implementation of both of these methods, we tested using the same HRTF dataset that the authors in both papers used to obtain results [19]. Our implementation of the cross-convolution method produced similar results to those reported in [18,9] using speech sounds. For the Speech Prefilter method, we found that the performance of our implementation of this method was strongly dependent on the specific speech utterance used.…”
Section: Polar Angle Estimationmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Two reference methods are tested: The first reference method is the Cross-Convolution method [18,9], which is a full-sphere localization method, and the second reference method is the Speech Prefilter method which is a median plane localization method [8]. To develop our implementation of both of these methods, we tested using the same HRTF dataset that the authors in both papers used to obtain results [19].…”
Section: Polar Angle Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, slight modifications are made to the reference methods to improve their robustness to the testing conditions, while the spirit of the methods are retained. The reference methods are the Cross-Convolution method [4,3], the Speech Prefilter method [5] and the MUSIC (MUltiple SIgnal Classification) Signal Subspace method [6]. Our implementation of these methods is described in [19].…”
Section: Testing Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, for robustness to different sound types and convolutive noise provided by the recording equipment, linear regression is used to remove the slow varying component in the spectra of the binaural sound received at both ears of the listener. The proposed method is compared with three state of the art reference methods [3,4,5,6], which have been selected for their different approaches to binaural sound source localization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is of interest in robot perception (e.g. for event detection and localization [6], [7]), where the receiver's transfer functions can be measured beforehand. For humans, this problem is restricted to two receivers (human ears) where functions of left and right pairs of HRTFs are mapped to their measurement directions in place of SSL directions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%