DOI: 10.1163/15406253-0410304003 View full text |Buy / Rent full text

Abstract: I argue that it is only on the condition of a preconceptual understanding that Zhuangzi’s metaphors can be cognitive. Kimchong Chong holds that the choice between metaphors as noncognitive and cognitive is a choice between Allinson and Davidson. Chong’s view of metaphors possessing multivalence is reducible to Davidson’s choice, because there is no built-in parameter between multivalence and limitless valence. If Zhuangzi’s metaphors were multivalent, the text would be subject to infinite interpretive viewpoin… Show more

Help me understand this report

This publication either has no citations yet, or we are still processing them

Set email alert for when this publication receives citations?

See others like this or search for similar articles