2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2019.05.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to perform and report an impactful analysis using partial least squares: Guidelines for confirmatory and explanatory IS research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
885
2
23

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,054 publications
(1,150 citation statements)
references
References 93 publications
13
885
2
23
Order By: Relevance
“…Age and gender were included as independent variables to control for their effects. Regarding the overall model fit the SRMR (= 0.070) is lower than the suggested threshold [42]. The adjusted R square equals 0.657.…”
Section: Partial Least Squares Semmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Age and gender were included as independent variables to control for their effects. Regarding the overall model fit the SRMR (= 0.070) is lower than the suggested threshold [42]. The adjusted R square equals 0.657.…”
Section: Partial Least Squares Semmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This method has been reported to have a superior performance compared with the Fornell-Larcker criterion [ 103 ]. For the first criterion, the HTMT value should be lower than 0.85 (indicating a stricter threshold) or 0.90 (indicating a more lenient threshold) or should be significantly smaller than 1 [ 104 106 ]. As shown in Table 5 , all HTMT values were below 0.85, thus indicating good discriminant validity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PLS‐PM is based on an iterative algorithm to obtain weights used for building linear combinations of observed indicators as proxies for all constructs in the model. Thus, PLS‐SEM is an effective method to estimate composite models (Benítez, Henseler, & Castillo, 2017; Müller, Schuberth, & Henseler, 2018) since composites scores are well determined with traditional PLS‐PM (Cepeda‐Carrión, Cegarra‐Navarro, & Cillo, 2019). Further advantages over covariance‐based SEM models include lesser assumptions for the measurement scales, sample size, and data distribution (Chin, 1998).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%