2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.copbio.2010.09.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to obtain labeled proteins and what to do with them

Abstract: We review new and established methods for the chemical modification of proteins in living cells and highlight recent applications. The review focuses on tag-mediated protein labeling methods, such as the tetracysteine tag and SNAP-tag, and new developments in this field such as intracellular labeling with lipoic acid ligase. Recent promising advances in the incorporation of unnatural amino acids into proteins are also briefly discussed. We describe new tools using tag-mediated labeling methods including the su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
222
0
4

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 258 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
0
222
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…SiR derivatives were shown to possess excellent spectroscopic properties, and in certain cases to be membrane permeable 8 . To achieve selective coupling of SiR derivatives to the proteins of interest, we envisioned exploiting self-labelling protein tags such as SNAP-tag 1 . SNAP-tag fusion proteins can be labelled specifically with molecular probes using benzylguanine (BG) derivatives 10,11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…SiR derivatives were shown to possess excellent spectroscopic properties, and in certain cases to be membrane permeable 8 . To achieve selective coupling of SiR derivatives to the proteins of interest, we envisioned exploiting self-labelling protein tags such as SNAP-tag 1 . SNAP-tag fusion proteins can be labelled specifically with molecular probes using benzylguanine (BG) derivatives 10,11 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…F lexible and specific methods to couple synthetic fluorescent probes to proteins in living cells are established, yet these methods are not generally compatible with the fluorophores best suited for live-cell imaging 1 . Fluorescent labels that are excited and emit in the near-infrared are especially biocompatible, because they avoid the use of light, which may cause phototoxicity or unwanted autofluorescent background 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3] Each of these methods has its own associated challenges: Selective labeling of a single cysteine residue frequently requires rounds of site-directed mutagenesis to introduce the labeling site and/or remove other cysteine residues, and selective labeling of the N-terminal amino group requires careful control of pH to ensure lysine residues are not also modified. [4] Other modern methods for chemoselective labeling often require the introduction of specific recognition sequences [5] or nonnatural amino acids into the protein to be labeled. [6] In most cases, a substantial excess of the labeling reagent is necessary to ensure complete conversion to the product.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Thus, they offer an interesting alternative to other forms of labeling by fluorescent proteins or ligands. Unlike antibody labeling, they are also compatible with live-cell imaging.…”
Section: Ynamic Measurements Of Single Molecules In Living Cellsmentioning
confidence: 99%