2000
DOI: 10.1006/abio.2000.4773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How to Measure and Analyze Tryptophan Fluorescence in Membranes Properly, and Why Bother?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

21
480
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 424 publications
(505 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
21
480
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, titration with bacterial cells did not cause significant variations in the fluorescent signal (Supplementary Figure 3), demonstrating the absence of any relevant scattering-related artifacts. 17,21 This conclusion was confirmed also by following peptide/bacteria association through variations in the dansyl fluorescence time-decay, which is not affected by scattering (Supplementary Figure 4). We calculated the fraction of peptide bound to bacterial membranes from the a Determined as the fraction of colony forming units (CFU) in a sample incubated for 2 h with different peptide concentrations, as compared with the CFU of the control at time zero, i.e., (4.5 ± 0.5) × 10 8 CFU/mL.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…In these cases, titration with bacterial cells did not cause significant variations in the fluorescent signal (Supplementary Figure 3), demonstrating the absence of any relevant scattering-related artifacts. 17,21 This conclusion was confirmed also by following peptide/bacteria association through variations in the dansyl fluorescence time-decay, which is not affected by scattering (Supplementary Figure 4). We calculated the fraction of peptide bound to bacterial membranes from the a Determined as the fraction of colony forming units (CFU) in a sample incubated for 2 h with different peptide concentrations, as compared with the CFU of the control at time zero, i.e., (4.5 ± 0.5) × 10 8 CFU/mL.…”
supporting
confidence: 53%
“…When introduced to anionic membrane models, all peptides displayed significant blue shifts in Trp k max values, ranging from 14 to 25 nm. These results provide evidence of peptide insertion into the bilayer 41 and effective removal of the peptides from the bulk aqueous environment even at concentrations below their MIC values. In contrast, the same series of peptides displays variable behavior in the presence of zwitterionic vesicles, which generally correlates with their R t values.…”
Section: Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 70%
“…Peptide partitioning into lipid bilayers was determined spectroscopically by fluorescence methods described by White et al(35;36). Partitioning of peptides into lipid bilayers was Fluorescence was recorded using excitation wavelength of 270 nm and scanning for emission between 290 and 500 nm with 8 nm bandwidths.…”
Section: Peptide Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scans were subtracted for background and lipid scattering effects. and compensated for scattering loss by scaling to free tryptophan samples at the same lipid concentration (36). From these data, the area under the curve was taken as a measure of the intensity (I) of tryptophan fluorescence.…”
Section: Peptide Partitioningmentioning
confidence: 99%