How to contain a tapeworm epidemic-testing the efficiency of different catch methods to reduce the translocated final hostEsox luciusin an alpine lake

Abstract

Half a century after introducing the final host Northern pike (Esox lucius L. 1758) into Lake Grundlsee in Austria, a sudden massive infection with the pike tapeworm Triaenophorus crassus Forel 1868 was noticed in the population of the intermediate host Arctic charr (Salvelinus umbla (L. 1758)) and led to the closure of this famous fishery. In an effort to contain the epidemic, a total of 1163 pike were removed over a period of three years (2008–2010). The efficiencies of gill and fyke netting as well as electro and spear fishing were assessed. All four methods were costly with EUR 37–371 to catch a single fish. During intensive fishing, catch per unit effort and fish lengths of pike declined. Fyke netting coupled with electro fishing turned out to be the most practicable strategy to reduce the pike stock. After another three years, prevalence of T. crassus in Arctic charr could be reduced by 40% in 2013. However, it will be impossible to completely eradicate pike and its parasite in the lake.

Tapeworms as pathogens of fish: A review

“…The different strategies can be used to control tapeworm infections to reflect their economic importance and the availability of suitable control measures, but also the status of the tapeworms in the fish population, that is established or recently introduced (Hoole, 1994;Kuhn et al, 2016;Schähle et al, 2016;Schaufler et al, 2015). Control of cestode larvae is more problematic compared to that of adults.…”

Pike (Esox lucius) stock management in designated brown trout (Salmo trutta) fisheries: Anglers’ preferences

“…Stock management is a regular feature of recreational fisheries, through habitat enhancement, stocking programmes and harvesting (Arlinghaus, 2006;Patrick et al, 2006;Marco-Rius et al, 2013;Arlinghaus et al, 2014;Thuesen et al, 2011;Schaufler et al, 2015). Stocking programmes often are based on the simple premise that stocking increases fish abundance, which leads to higher catch rates and more satisfied anglers (Loomis and Fix, 1998;Patterson and Sullivan, 2013), an idea that has been demonstrated as flawed under certain circumstances (Schultz and Dodd, 2008;Patterson and Sullivan, 2013).…”