2012
DOI: 10.1068/a44330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Spatial Segregation Changes over Time: Sorting Out the Sorting Processes

Abstract: Although there is strong evidence that segregation on socio-economic lines has risen in the many countries over the last few decades, comparatively little is known about the processes by which this happens. While it is often assumed that selective migration is the dominant process, this is rarely demonstrated. This paper proposes a more comprehensive framework to analyse processes driving changes in segregation -a 'neighbourhood accounts' framework.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
60
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
(53 reference statements)
5
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a trade-off between a greater number of groups a variable is categorised into providing more accurate matches, yet also being less likely to get exact matching for all cases (Iacus et al, 2012). Age, sex and annual income (£) were used since previous research has demonstrated differences in migration patterns by these factors (Bailey, 2012;Catney and Simpson, 2010;Champion, 2012;Evandrou et al, 2010). No further variables were included to minimise the amount of noise added to the process, as it becomes more difficult to find exact matches across a greater range of variables (Iacus et al, 2011(Iacus et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a trade-off between a greater number of groups a variable is categorised into providing more accurate matches, yet also being less likely to get exact matching for all cases (Iacus et al, 2012). Age, sex and annual income (£) were used since previous research has demonstrated differences in migration patterns by these factors (Bailey, 2012;Catney and Simpson, 2010;Champion, 2012;Evandrou et al, 2010). No further variables were included to minimise the amount of noise added to the process, as it becomes more difficult to find exact matches across a greater range of variables (Iacus et al, 2011(Iacus et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sorting and re-sorting of people across space gives rise to segregation and, in turn, to the possibility of neighbourhood effects. Many studies portray selective migration as the only factor giving rise to segregation but there is growing recognition of a wider range of processes at work (Finney and Simpson 2009 ;Bailey 2012 ) . Understanding the relative contribution of selective migration and other processes to changes in segregation may aid our understanding of how neighbourhood effects operate.…”
Section: Why Understanding Population Dynamics Aids Neighbourhood Effmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The potential for 'noise' to swamp any 'signal' is very great and there is a corresponding danger that any biases in measurement may have a substantial in fl uence on results. Bailey andLivingston ( 2007, 2008 ) review the different methods that have been used to study selective migration. They stress the inherent weakness of estimates derived from 'mover surveys' in particular.…”
Section: Selective Migration Neighbourhood Change and Migration Typomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…What we know now is that even without any discriminatory behavior in the housing market a slight preference for "like" neighbors can create significant levels of residential separation (sorting) as an outcome of mobility and cause it to persist. In other words, there are powerful forces at work to sort and to continue to sort populations by race, ethnicity and social status (Bailey, 2012;Clark and Morrison, 2012;Clark et al, 2014;Pais et al, 2009).…”
Section: Sorting Selection and Segregationmentioning
confidence: 99%