2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00436-019-06399-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Ponto-Caspian invaders affect local parasite communities of native fish

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Introduced animals may (i) bring their parasites and transfer them to native hosts (spill-over), intensifying the negative impact on native host populations and changing their parasite communities; (ii) lose all or most of their parasites (enemy release) and obtain an advantage over native species; and (iii) acquire local native parasites and induce a spillback or a dilution effect on native hosts [50,[72][73][74][75][76]. In all the aforementioned scenarios, parasites may affect or even drive the invasion dynamics with repercussions on host and non-host species, and biodiversity in general [77][78][79].…”
Section: Ecological Importance Of Parasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Introduced animals may (i) bring their parasites and transfer them to native hosts (spill-over), intensifying the negative impact on native host populations and changing their parasite communities; (ii) lose all or most of their parasites (enemy release) and obtain an advantage over native species; and (iii) acquire local native parasites and induce a spillback or a dilution effect on native hosts [50,[72][73][74][75][76]. In all the aforementioned scenarios, parasites may affect or even drive the invasion dynamics with repercussions on host and non-host species, and biodiversity in general [77][78][79].…”
Section: Ecological Importance Of Parasitesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…have been intentionally introduced to improve fish stocks since the 1950s: several cases of these deliberate introductions into freshwaters ecosystems are reported by MacNeil and collaborators [90]. Moreover, exotic amphipods have spread accidentally thanks to passages and distribution pathways (e.g., water ballast, cargo shipping, ship lifts, and canals) provided by anthropogenic actions [79,104]. A famous invader, the killer shrimp, Dikerogammarus villosus, moved from the Ponto-Caspian region, colonizing the main water systems of Western and Central Europe after the inauguration of the Rhine-Main-Danube canal in 1992 [105][106][107].…”
Section: Ecological Role Of Amphipodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ellipses in the centre and the drawings depict the impact categories as defined by Cucherousset and Olden (2011). References 1: Lindner et al (2013); 2: Janac, Bryja, Ondrackova, Mendel, and Jurajda (2017); 3: Kornis, Carlson, Lehrer‐Brey, and Vander Zanden (2014); 4: McCallum et al (2014); 5: Getchell et al (2013); 6: van Kessel, Dorenbosch, Kranenbarg, van der Velde, and Leuven (2016); 7: Hohenadler et al (2019); 8: Gendron and Marcogliese (2016); 9: Bunnell, Johnson, and Knight (2005); 10: Pagnucco, Remmal, and Ricciardi (2016); 11: Hale et al (2016); 12: Pronin, Fleischer, Baldanova, and Pronina (1997)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism of the introduction of new parasite species to local hosts through an invasive species, and the resulting increase of prevalence in native host communities is called parasite spillover (e.g. Hohenadler et al, 2019). It has already been observed for example by an examination of the marine parasitic copepod Mytilicola orientalis Mori, 1935, in Northern Europe, which does not only infect its principal host, the invasive Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793), but also native blue mussels Mytilus edulis Linné, 1758 and common cockles Cerastoderma edule (Linné, 1758) (Goedknegt et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%