1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0909(199906)5:2<78::aid-dys127>3.3.co;2-#
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
How persistent is reading disability? Individual growth curves in reading
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
6
3
2
1
Citation Types
1
9
0
0
Year Published
2000
2021
Publication Types
Select...
11
Relationship
0
11
Authors
Journals
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
References 0 publications
1
9
0
0
“…However, what speak against this is that around 5% of the total sample was identified as poor readers, which is the percentage often mentioned as being dyslexic manifested by poor word decoding (Ramus, ). The fact that the students identified as poor readers in grade 2 were still poor readers in grade 8 is in line with other studies (Jacobson, ; Snow, Burns, & Griffin, ). Thus, despite the reading intervention in grade 3, the students performed poorly in readingārelated skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, what speak against this is that around 5% of the total sample was identified as poor readers, which is the percentage often mentioned as being dyslexic manifested by poor word decoding (Ramus, ). The fact that the students identified as poor readers in grade 2 were still poor readers in grade 8 is in line with other studies (Jacobson, ; Snow, Burns, & Griffin, ). Thus, despite the reading intervention in grade 3, the students performed poorly in readingārelated skills.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…However, there is still a need to support students with reading difficulties after formal reading instruction has started (Wanzek, Wexler, Vaughn, & Ciullo, ). The vast majority of students exhibiting poor reading in early grades do not catch up with their peers in later grades (de Jong & van der Leij, ; Jacobson, ; Landerl & Wimmer, ). McNamara, Scissons, and Gutknecth () demonstrated that children defined as having poor phonological skills in kindergarten were poor on word decoding skills in grades 1 through 3.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason why the researchers chose this approach was to obtain a more thorough view regarding gender differences in reading. Earlier studies have shown that girls in middle school often have higher results on reading tests such as word recognition and reading fluency than boys (Jacobson, , ). Therefore, the present study used separate norms for girls and boys, wherever possible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since dyslexia seems to reflect a developmental deviance (Stanovich, Siegel & Gottardo, 1997), the nonāimpaired readers do not serve as a suitable control for the progress made by the dyslexic group during the treatment period. In this sense, the normal reading development of dyslexics is a more informative control condition; there is clear evidence that the reading deficit of dyslexics is stable over the years (Foorman et al, 1997; Jacobson, 1999; Juel, 1988; Stanovich, 1986). The goal of this study was to test whether participants, starting with a reading and spelling deficit, can obtain a more or less normal level of reading and spelling skills after the treatment with the LEXY programme.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
