2003
DOI: 10.1086/375341
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Massive Single Stars End Their Life

Abstract: How massive stars die-what sort of explosion and remnant each produces-depends chiefly on the masses of their helium cores and hydrogen envelopes at death. For single stars, stellar winds are the only means of mass loss, and these are a function of the metallicity of the star. We discuss how metallicity, and a simplified prescription for its effect on mass loss, affects the evolution and final fate of massive stars. We map, as a function of mass and metallicity, where black holes and neutron stars are likely t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

91
2,253
5
10

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,968 publications
(2,359 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
91
2,253
5
10
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us suppose, as argued by Heger et al (2003) which are poorly understood, and estimated to occur in ~1-10% of the massive corecollapse events (Fryer et al 2006). To the extent that this is a correct picture we see that a substantial fraction of core-collapse events during the WR epoch will not eject large amounts of newly synthesized material, including 59 Ni, into the superbubble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Let us suppose, as argued by Heger et al (2003) which are poorly understood, and estimated to occur in ~1-10% of the massive corecollapse events (Fryer et al 2006). To the extent that this is a correct picture we see that a substantial fraction of core-collapse events during the WR epoch will not eject large amounts of newly synthesized material, including 59 Ni, into the superbubble.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…5 Theoretical models (see e.g., Heger et al 2003) indicate that the core collapses of main sequence stars with different initial masses and metallicity could result in black holes or neutron stars. The low explosion energy and less mass ejected by SN 2006aj are consistent with a low mass ∼ 20M main sequence star, which is predicted to result in a neutron star after core collapse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result is that mass loss increases rapidly with mass, so stars with initial mass ∼ 9 M end their lives with most of their H envelopes, while massive stars lose their H envelope by the time of the explosion. The transition to the loss of H envelope occurs at an initial mass ∼ 30 M (Heger et al 2003). Among the massive stars, at low metallicity there is also a transition to the point where the core becomes so massive that there is direct collapse to a black hole without an explosion, ∼ 40 M .…”
Section: Expectations From Massive Star Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chevalier In going to low metallicity, the mass loss rates due to stellar winds are generally taken to have a dependence ∝ Z n with n ≈ 0.5 (e.g., Heger et al 2003). For O stars and Wolf-Rayet stars there is some observational support for this dependence, but for red supergiants this is simply an estimate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation