2010
DOI: 10.1021/ed100409p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Long Can Students Pay Attention in Class? A Study of Student Attention Decline Using Clickers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

8
212
1
19

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(269 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
8
212
1
19
Order By: Relevance
“…Classroom investigations that probed students' thoughts during lectures, discussions, or other activities, have focused on contrasting the rates of different thought types across different contexts. Off-task thoughts unrelated to course content occur 10-35% of the time, with lower TUT rates during movies, demonstrations, and problem-solving activities (Locke & Jensen, 1974;Schoen, 1970) and higher TUT rates during lectures and student presentations (Bunce, Flens, & Neiles, 2010; Cameron & Giuntuli, 1972;Locke & Jensen, 1974).…”
Section: Mind Wandering During Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Classroom investigations that probed students' thoughts during lectures, discussions, or other activities, have focused on contrasting the rates of different thought types across different contexts. Off-task thoughts unrelated to course content occur 10-35% of the time, with lower TUT rates during movies, demonstrations, and problem-solving activities (Locke & Jensen, 1974;Schoen, 1970) and higher TUT rates during lectures and student presentations (Bunce, Flens, & Neiles, 2010; Cameron & Giuntuli, 1972;Locke & Jensen, 1974).…”
Section: Mind Wandering During Lecturesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classroom investigations that probed students' thoughts during lectures, discussions, or other activities, have focused on contrasting the rates of different thought types across different contexts. Off-task thoughts unrelated to course content occur 10-35% of the time, with lower TUT rates during movies, demonstrations, and problem-solving activities (Locke & Jensen, 1974;Schoen, 1970) and higher TUT rates during lectures and student presentations (Bunce, Flens, & Neiles, 2010; Cameron & Giuntuli, 1972;Locke & Jensen, 1974).TUT rates are not trivial (15-25%), however, even during "active learning" contexts designed to maximally engage students (Geerlings, 1995;Shukor, 2005).Only two classroom studies have examined the association between mind wandering and learning. Lindquist and McLean (2011) found that TUT rate during a single lecture correlated significantly but weakly with exam scores and final grades in the course (Kendall's τ ≈ -.13).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a commonly held belief that students do not pay attention *Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Health & Human Performance, Elon University, Elon, NC 27244, USA; Tel: +1(336) 278-5862; Fax: +1(336) 278-4143; E-mail: ebailey@elon.edu during an entire classroom period and some authors suggest that an unmotivated student is unlikely to pay attention beyond 20 m [6]. Work by Bunce and colleagues [7] indicate that college-aged students experience ever-shortening cycles of engagement vs. non-engagement during a traditional 50 m lecture as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CI with the use of ICTs, and the application of active teaching methodologies, play a fundamental role in the levels of attention of the students. [2] in their research, demonstrated a positive interrelation between levels of attention and active teaching methodologies, they found that periods of concentration of students increased if the teacher applied active teaching instead of lectures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%