2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.04.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How global careers unfold in practice: Evidence from international project work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In line with this, the idea of "the firm as a community of practice" (CoP) (Buckley and Carter, 2002) is especially relevant. Welch and Welch (2015) look at the concept of CoP from an international human resource management point of view and acknowledge that it contributes to building global career capital. Other authors such as Raab et al (2014), Buckley and Carter (2004) or Noorderhaven and Harzing (2009) study how knowledge sharing or combination that takes place within MNCs.…”
Section: The Role Of the Geographical Communities Of Practice (Cops) mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In line with this, the idea of "the firm as a community of practice" (CoP) (Buckley and Carter, 2002) is especially relevant. Welch and Welch (2015) look at the concept of CoP from an international human resource management point of view and acknowledge that it contributes to building global career capital. Other authors such as Raab et al (2014), Buckley and Carter (2004) or Noorderhaven and Harzing (2009) study how knowledge sharing or combination that takes place within MNCs.…”
Section: The Role Of the Geographical Communities Of Practice (Cops) mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the concept of CoP is not new (Lave and Wenger, 1991;Brown andDuguid, 1991, Wenger et al, 2002) not many authors have worked on it from an international business point of view, and when they have done it (see Welch and Welch, 2015;Raab et al, 2014, Buckley andCarter, 2004;Noorderhaven and Harzing, 2009;Haghirian, 2006) the approach taken has been intra-organizational, i.e. among units of the same MNC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most researched topic among the themes is success factors for and challenges to global talent management. Twelve out of the 21 studies have investigated challenges to and critical success factors of global talent management (see Cole, 2011; Farndale et al, 2014; Furusawa & Brewster, 2015; Garavan, 2012; Latukha, 2015; McNulty & De Cieri, 2016; Preece et al, 2013; Sidani & Al Ariss, 2014; Sparrow et al, 2013; Walk et al, 2013; D. Welch & Welch, 2015; Woollard, 2010).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Welch & Welch, 2015; Woollard, 2010). Studies looking at challenges and success factors to global talent management identify challenges, such as huge financial costs in the management of talents in the global arena, high rate of turnover (Woollard, 2010), cultural differences (Walk et al, 2013), corporate culture that favours individualization (Farndale et al, 2014), global talent knowledge transfer problems (Welch & Welch, 2015), localization difficulties (Latukha, 2015; Sidani & Al Ariss, 2014), balancing economic legitimacy with legal legitimacy (Sidani & Al Ariss, 2014), designing global talent management programmes for the management of bicultural people (Furusawa & Brewster, 2015), cultural and interactional adjustment problems of expatriate spouses (e.g., Cole, 2011), challenges of setting up the regional headquarters, legitimacy and contribution issues relating to the role of the regional headquarters, specific regional talent management matters and centralization versus decentralization within the region (Preece et al, 2013), difficulties in selecting a more suitable global talent management approach (i.e., inclusive approach or exclusive approach) to adopt and the impact of business models on global talent management (the level of centralization or decentralization; Sparrow et al, 2013). These challenges are mainly firm-level problems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation