2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101497
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How follower traits and cultural values influence the effects of leadership

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study by ( Zhu et al 2009 ), he found that follower characteristics have a positive relationship with follower work engagement at the individual level. However, the relationship between follower characteristics and leadership effectiveness is complex ( Matthews et al 2021 ), and the explanation for this result remains to be explored in depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study by ( Zhu et al 2009 ), he found that follower characteristics have a positive relationship with follower work engagement at the individual level. However, the relationship between follower characteristics and leadership effectiveness is complex ( Matthews et al 2021 ), and the explanation for this result remains to be explored in depth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…173-174) also referred to as "ethical-oriented leadership" (Michel et al, 2011), "moral leadership" (Lee et al, 2020a(Lee et al, , 2020b, or "ethical/moral values-based leadership" (Hoch et al, 2018). In addition to these effective leadership types, many leader behavior taxonomies include categories that refer to passive or destructive leadership (Kaluza et al, 2020;Matthews et al, 2021;Schyns & Schilling, 2013;Skogstad et al, 2007). Accordingly, our review is organized around six leadership meta-categories: (1) change-oriented (e.g., transformational), (2) task-oriented (e.g., transactional), (3) relationaloriented (e.g., supportive), (4) values-based and moral (e.g., ethical), ( 5) passive (e.g., laissez-faire), and ( 6) destructive (e.g., abusive supervision) leader behaviors, which is also consistent with more recent meta-analyses on leadership (e.g., Lee & Carpenter, 2018;Montano et al, 2017).…”
Section: Leadership and Workplace Aggressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sturm et al (2021, p. 1), "leadership is a social process depending on the characteristics of the leader, followers, and the interaction between the two -it is also contextually rooted, within a broader social milieu". According to Leavy (2021, p. 22), there is a paucity of research on "the dynamics of the relationship between the leader and led", with some research stating that not all 'followers' are the same (Bastardoz and Van Vugt, 2019;Matthews et al, 2021). Tentatively, this draws a link to the notion of situated rationality, in that 'followers' may experience situated rationalities differently.…”
Section: Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 99%