2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10018-021-00304-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How effective are protected natural areas when roads are present? An analysis of the Peruvian case

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sin embargo, la mayoría de los estudios evaluaron iniciativas de conservación basadas solo en desincentivos. Dentro de este tipo de iniciativas, la efectividad de las ANP y/o sus áreas de amortiguamiento fue la que se evaluó con mayor frecuencia, considerando tanto sus efectos ambientales [27,31,36,[41][42][43], como los socioeconómicos [20,37]. Además de las fiscalizaciones de OSINFOR ya mencionadas, otra evaluación consideró la efectividad de las fiscalizaciones de OSINFOR en reducir la tala ilegal dentro de concesiones forestales con fines maderables en Loreto, Ucayali y Madre de Dios [44].…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Sin embargo, la mayoría de los estudios evaluaron iniciativas de conservación basadas solo en desincentivos. Dentro de este tipo de iniciativas, la efectividad de las ANP y/o sus áreas de amortiguamiento fue la que se evaluó con mayor frecuencia, considerando tanto sus efectos ambientales [27,31,36,[41][42][43], como los socioeconómicos [20,37]. Además de las fiscalizaciones de OSINFOR ya mencionadas, otra evaluación consideró la efectividad de las fiscalizaciones de OSINFOR en reducir la tala ilegal dentro de concesiones forestales con fines maderables en Loreto, Ucayali y Madre de Dios [44].…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Similarly, many studies across the biome linked forest loss to roads, reflected by a distinctive fish-bone pattern of deforestation. In fact, accessibility to markets via roads was identified as an important underlying driver in the Amazon [74][75][76][77]. Infrastructure thus acts as a twofold driver, both proximate and underlying, and often dictates the pattern of deforestation.…”
Section: ) How Do the Proximate Causes Underlying Drivers And Moderat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aligns with the classic net present value model of deforestation behavior (whereby land users are assumed to be motivated by differences in the discount flow of income they can get from different land uses). Studies in Peru [51,74], Bolivia [85,86], Ecuador [77,87] and Brazil [88,89] find that accessibility via roads and the resulting lowered transportation costs to local markets was associated with increased deforestation, especially due to pasture expansion and small-scale agriculture. Deforestation driven by local market access often spreads in a recognizable fishbone pattern from roads in less remote areas [90][91][92].…”
Section: Underlying Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of the Amazon, Barber et al (2014) and Miranda et al (2016) find that PAs have mitigating effects on forest clearing in Brazil and Peru, respectively. Further, Pfaff et al (2015) find that PAs reduce deforestation in Brazil, correcting for the location bias (PAs are typically located in less-prone-to-deforestation areas), 6 and Aguirre et al (2021) find that natural PAs can help reduce deforestation in the presence of a growing road network in Peru. Distinguishing between strict versus mixed-use PAs, Blackman (2015) studies the Guatemala's Maya Biosphere Reserve, the largest park in the country, and finds that mixed-use PAs-which allow sustainable extractive activities-are more effective than strictly PAs, because of the operation of forest concessions.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%