2012
DOI: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How early can we repair pectus excavatum: the earlier the better?

Abstract: Our results suggest that routine early repair of pectus excavatum in patients older than 3 years of age is safe and effective. We would recommend early repair to avoid asymmetry transformation of the deformity and to enhance the patients' growth potential.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, correction of PE had some significant effects on TS. The optimal age for the correction of the deformity is a controversial issue (14)(15)(16)(17). However, these findings suggest that early correction of PE can reduce TS in patients with PE (11,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, correction of PE had some significant effects on TS. The optimal age for the correction of the deformity is a controversial issue (14)(15)(16)(17). However, these findings suggest that early correction of PE can reduce TS in patients with PE (11,13).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A patient's age is also a risk factor for asymmetrical transformation of pectus excavatum. [19] As mentioned above, asymmetry increases the diffi culty of surgical repair. Thus, early surgical correction, prior to asymmetrical transformation, can aid in avoiding doublebar insertion.…”
Section: Original Articlementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Likewise, severe asymmetry and a higher Haller index and Depression index are more difficult to deal with. Through our experience, we found a good correlation with age of the patient and the risk of complications [16].…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…This policy was not chosen arbitrarily, but could not be avoided and was as a result of the availability of techniques and devices over the course of this study. In our later experience, more young patients came to surgery, and, consequently, demographics among the groups were different [16]. Nevertheless, we have more adult patients in new device groups, as the total number of patients with the next-generation approach was higher than the stabilizer applied patients.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 94%