2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.cplett.2009.09.079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does microhydration impact on structure, spectroscopy and formation of disulfide radical anions? An ab initio investigation on dimethyldisulfide

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The drastic ring strain indeed leads to a mixing of MOs, as discussed by Maity on disulfide radical cations 31 ], the slope in eq 2 implies that considerable blue or red shifts can be achieved, since hemibonded systems are highly malleable. 10,32 For convenience, one can propose a rule of thumb to estimate them, with a deviation of 46 nm per 0.1 Å knowing that λ max ref = 436 nm for d = 2.79 Å. At this stage, we have evidenced a clear geometrical dependence on a constrained prototypical disulfide RA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The drastic ring strain indeed leads to a mixing of MOs, as discussed by Maity on disulfide radical cations 31 ], the slope in eq 2 implies that considerable blue or red shifts can be achieved, since hemibonded systems are highly malleable. 10,32 For convenience, one can propose a rule of thumb to estimate them, with a deviation of 46 nm per 0.1 Å knowing that λ max ref = 436 nm for d = 2.79 Å. At this stage, we have evidenced a clear geometrical dependence on a constrained prototypical disulfide RA.…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Such an analysis involves three relevant descriptors: adiabatic electron affinity (AEA), inter-sulfur distance d SS , and longest wavelength of maximal absorption k max . However, we established a nearly linear dependence between the two latter properties [31,6], and only AEA and d SS are considered in this Letter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…It is important to consider that a balance between solute–water and w–w interactions determines the structure of a hydrated organic complex. In this regard, Geronimo et al have recently introduced a ratio to measure semi–quantitatively the competitive formation of solute–water and inter-water H-bonds network in hydrogen-bonded hydrated complexes defined as scriptH = normalΔ E normalΔ E normals normalw + E def normalc + E def normalw normalΔ E where E def–c and E def–w are deformation energies (one per subclusters), which correspond to the energy difference between the frozen geometry within the microhydrated complexes and the absolute geometry minimum for each monomer. The E def–w for each complex is the sum of the individual deformation energy of the n water in it.…”
Section: Methods and Calculation Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%