2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2020.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How does carbon tax affect social welfare and emission reduction in Finland?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, an increase in sharing of cars reduces CO 2 emissions. Khastar et al (2020) also point out that an adequate environmental tax level poses a mitigating effect on CO 2 emissions in the European Union countries. Furthermore, Reaños (2020) argue that carbon tax has a significant effect on CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consequently, an increase in sharing of cars reduces CO 2 emissions. Khastar et al (2020) also point out that an adequate environmental tax level poses a mitigating effect on CO 2 emissions in the European Union countries. Furthermore, Reaños (2020) argue that carbon tax has a significant effect on CO 2 emissions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Furthermore, carbon taxes affect the GDP negatively and affect economic growth [25,26]. Finally, regarding the effects of the carbon tax on residents' welfare, Khastar et al demonstrated that the Finnish carbon tax had a specific negative impact on social welfare [27].…”
Section: Research On Carbon Tax and Carbon Tax Recycling Policymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, a carbon tax recovery policy supplemented by technological progress in the clean power sector can promote economic growth, improve social welfare, and reduce the intensity of carbon dioxide emissions, realizing the triple dividend of the carbon tax. Carbon tax alone can reduce carbon emissions and adjust the energy structure, but the carbon tax policy will adversely affect economic development and social welfare [25][26][27]. A carbon tax recovery policy can remedy this problem.…”
Section: Conclusion and Policy Suggestionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For logistics companies that purchase a large number of machines and equipment and build, renovate and expand logistics facilities during their period of scale expansion, the tax reduction benefit from lowering the value-added tax rate is the greatest. Clearly, lowering the tax rate has formed a two-way (upstream and downstream) complementary incentive mechanism for the development of the real economy [41]. The manufacturing industry has a strong function that is of extraordinary significance to sustained economic prosperity and social stability [42].…”
Section: Increase Investment To Promote the Transformation And Upgrading Of Manufacturingmentioning
confidence: 99%