2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2020.06.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do lenders evaluate borrowers in peer-to-peer lending in China?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to focusing on credit risk control, there are several business processes in P2P Lending, such as the borrower registration process, the credit risk assessment process, the disbursement process, the collection process, the refund or payment process, and the investment process by lenders (Suryono et al, 2019b). Interestingly, current research focuses not only on credit risk assessment but also on how investors, in this case, lenders, evaluate borrowers by including demographic characteristics (Chen et al, 2020). Using more than 178,000 loan lists in China, Ding et al (2019) found that lenders consider the borrower's reputation as the primary signal in P2P lending transaction decisions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to focusing on credit risk control, there are several business processes in P2P Lending, such as the borrower registration process, the credit risk assessment process, the disbursement process, the collection process, the refund or payment process, and the investment process by lenders (Suryono et al, 2019b). Interestingly, current research focuses not only on credit risk assessment but also on how investors, in this case, lenders, evaluate borrowers by including demographic characteristics (Chen et al, 2020). Using more than 178,000 loan lists in China, Ding et al (2019) found that lenders consider the borrower's reputation as the primary signal in P2P lending transaction decisions.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, biases – both unconscious (implicit bias) and conscious (statistical and taste-based discriminations) – can negatively affect minorities, especially female fundraisers (Younkin and Kuppuswamy, 2018). In lending-based crowdfunding, scholars have shown that due to the prevalence of taste-based discrimination, males are more likely to be funded than females, but also more likely to default on loans (Chen et al , 2020a). Chen et al (2017) postulated that females tend to have higher funding probability, but that is because of the co-existence of costly taste-based discrimination (higher interest rate) and profitable statistical-based discrimination (lower default rate).…”
Section: Main Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From another perspective, however, if P2P platforms fail to formulate relevant regulations and supervision, they can only rely on ethical standards. For instance, people with higher education are more likely to obtain loans and pay them back [ 2 ]. Taking China as an example, despite the rapid development of crowdlending in this country, the Chinese market faces a high moral hazard and negative consequences, including numerous platform failures and loss of investors’ deposits.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%