2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How do 28 European Union Member States perform in agricultural greenhouse gas emissions? It depends on what we look at: Application of the multi-criteria analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total rate of GHG emissions given as t CO 2 eq. from agriculture per country per year is estimated by following the IPCC guidelines for national GHG inventory [32]. The main contributors to GHG emissions from the agriculture sector are methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O).…”
Section: Case Study-agriculture Sector In Latviamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total rate of GHG emissions given as t CO 2 eq. from agriculture per country per year is estimated by following the IPCC guidelines for national GHG inventory [32]. The main contributors to GHG emissions from the agriculture sector are methane (CH 4 ) and nitrous oxide (N 2 O).…”
Section: Case Study-agriculture Sector In Latviamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the long-term target is to reduce GHG emissions in agriculture by approximately 30% by 2050 compared to 2005 levels (European Commission, 2011). Up to now, EU actions have resulted in an overall decrease of GHG emissions of more than 24% with respect to 1990 and about 3% compared to 2005, progressively decoupled with the gross domestic product (increased by 47% with respect to 1990) (Dace and Blumberga, 2016;European Environment Agency, 2016a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore, considering typical features such as clear and easily understandable geometric meaning, while simultaneously considering both best and worst points of view, and convenient calculation and implementation [25][26][27], TOPSIS is a popular method for solving problems in decision making [28], for example, in 2012, Behzadian et al reviewed 266 scholarly papers from 103 journals since the year 2000, and they found that TOPSIS methodology has been successfully applied globally to a wide range of application areas and industrial sectors with varying terms and subjects, mainly including supply chain management and logistics, design, engineering and manufacturing systems, business and marketing management, health, safety and environment management, human resources management, energy management, chemical engineering, water resources management, and other topics [29]. Recently, TOPSIS method has been applied in more subjects, for example, Çetinkaya et al applied a GIS-combined TOPSIS method to identify and rank the potential refugee camp sites for southeastern Turkey [30]; Morteza et al employed the TOPSIS obtain final priorities for the investors in tourism industries to select the optimal tourism site in a fuzzy environment in the Integrated Coastal Zone Management in Iran [31]; Dace and Blumberga applied TOPSIS as one of the three main approaches to compare the 28 European Union Member States with respect to the emission intensity of the agricultural sector [32]. However, the use of TOPSIS as a tool for the city comparison with respect to sustainability has not been reported in the literature reviewed by the authors.…”
Section: Methodology: Topsismentioning
confidence: 99%