1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.1999.00145.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How can the variability in ultrasound measurement of intima‐media thickness be reduced? Studies of interobserver variability in carotid and femoral arteries

Abstract: A critical component in scientific studies of most biological variables is the variation or error in measurements which leads to non-identical results of repeated measurements from the same subject. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the interobserver error (s) in measurement of intima-media thickness (IMT) in carotid and femoral arteries could be decreased if the mean value obtained using two ultrasound images from each of the right and left arteries was used in the analyses instead of the mean … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
70
4
3

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
(26 reference statements)
6
70
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…4) No statistical significant differences were found between the automated and the manual IMT measurements for both CCA sides and therefore automated measurements may be used to replace the manual measurements. No significant differences between the automated and the manual IMT measurements were also reported in [6], [10]- [12], and [15]. The mean difference between the manual and the automated mean IMT measurements found in this study was 0.01 mm, which is in the same order as also found in other studies VOLUME 3, 2015 performed by our group [17], [18], [36], [37] and also documented in [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4) No statistical significant differences were found between the automated and the manual IMT measurements for both CCA sides and therefore automated measurements may be used to replace the manual measurements. No significant differences between the automated and the manual IMT measurements were also reported in [6], [10]- [12], and [15]. The mean difference between the manual and the automated mean IMT measurements found in this study was 0.01 mm, which is in the same order as also found in other studies VOLUME 3, 2015 performed by our group [17], [18], [36], [37] and also documented in [4].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…It was also shown in [14], that the CCA IMT may be possibly used in the prediction of possible infarct side, and in the prediction of potential risk of stroke by evaluating the IMT on both sides of the CCA. There have been few studies regarding the effect of carotid IMT sidedness on the various risk factors associated with carotid IMT [9]- [11], [15]. Because of the different anatomical origins of the left versus the right CCA, it was speculated that hemodynamics, age, gender, blood lipid level, blood glucose level, and other risk factors would have different effects depending on whether the left or right CCA was considered [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The laboratory technician performing the ultrasound examination was blinded to the clinical status of each subject. Interobserver variability for measurement of IMT in the common carotid artery (CCA) and the carotid artery bulb has been shown to be 5.3 and 6.0%, respectively (11). Both the left and right carotid arteries were scanned at the level of the bifurcation, and images for IMT measurements were recorded from the far wall in the CCA and in the carotid artery bulb.…”
Section: Ultrasound Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interobserver variations for IMT have been shown to be satisfactory. 32 The present analysis used the average of measurements of IMT from the left and right common carotid arteries (common carotid artery and carotid bulb).…”
Section: Ultrasonography: Imtmentioning
confidence: 99%