How Adults With Serious Mental Illness Learn and Use Wellness Recovery Action Plan’s Recovery Framework

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate how adults with serious mental illness learn and utilize an illness self-management framework for pursuing recovery through a program called Wellness Recovery Action Plan (WRAP). The researchers employed an interpretive descriptive methodology with thematic analysis. Data were collected from three focus groups ( n = 26) and in-depth interviews with follow-up member checks with 10 participants ( n = 20 interviews). Findings aligned with main constructs of self-determination theory (SDT) to explain how an autonomy-supportive environment created opportunities for participants to build competency, implementing personalized recovery strategies that are socially endorsed by peers, resulting in internalized motivation for continued application of WRAP’s framework. SDT appears to explain mechanisms of change for WRAP. Recommendations for mental health organizations include broadly ensuring autonomy-supportive environments and services that maximize opportunities to build competence in recovery strategies in collaboration with peers. Future research may utilize SDT as the theoretical basis for investigating self-management programs.

An Update of Peer Support/Peer Provided Services Underlying Processes, Benefits, and Critical Ingredients

“…Second, it is frequently about delivering a service that can be paid for through program dollars or reimbursed by governmental insurance, although in some organizations, it also offered on a voluntary basis. Consequently, the service is more structured today, rather than primarily providing informal support, and may involve the delivery of evidence-based interventions, such as self-management programs including Wellness Recovery Action Planning [11], developed by a peer, and Illness Management and Recovery [12], which was developed by professionals and is delivered by both peers and non-peers [13]. Other programs provided have been developed by peers such as emotional CPR [14] or co-produced by peers and non-peer scientists such as PeerTECH [15,16].…”

“Communitas in Crisis”: An Autoethnography of Psychosis Under Lockdown

“…Although in the 21st century a purely biological model of recovery from mental illness has been largely discounted, psychosis is sometimes framed as the exception, with ongoing medication and-in more severe cases-hospitalization, widely regarded as essential for safety and recovery (Bethall, 2009). There is growing recognition of the benefits of involving those with mental illness in the reframing of their own recovery narratives (Fixsen & Ridge, 2017;Petros & Solomon, 2021), yet those removed from "normal" society are generally deemed less capable of independent, coherent thinking. Based on his experiences of decades working in psychiatric facilities, Bethall's (2009) account of the sequence of events befalling patients who enter these wards bears remarkable similarities to my own story (see pp.…”

Fragile minds, porous selves: Shining a light on autoethnography of mental illness

“…They label such people as social misfits, and commonly the social misfits are admitted to psychiatric wards. (McMahon, 2020: 21) There is growing recognition of the benefits of involving those with mental illness in the reframing of their own recovery narratives (Petros and Solomon, 2021;Fixsen, 2021). Yet, those removed from 'normal' society are generally deemed less capable of independent, coherent thinking.…”