2014
DOI: 10.1063/1.4855275
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How accurate is the strongly orthogonal geminal theory in predicting excitation energies? Comparison of the extended random phase approximation and the linear response theory approaches

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inPerformance of the antisymmetrized product of strongly orthogonal geminal (APSG) ansatz in describing ground states of molecules has been extensively explored in the recent years. Not much is known, however, about possibilities of obtaining excitation energies from methods that would rely on the APSG ansatz. In the paper we investigate the recently proposed extended random phase approximations, ERPA and ERPA2, that employ APSG reduced density matrices. We also propose a time-de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A confirmation of this statement has been delivered by the results for the H 2 and HeH + molecules, obtained within the adiabatic TD-PINO formalism with the PILS functional and the extended RPA results with the APSG density matrices. The latter approach has been shown to be equivalent to the adiabatic TD-PINO if the APSG functional is employed [165] and has been tested on several small molecules. Even though it recovers certain double excitations, its overall accuracy is not satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…A confirmation of this statement has been delivered by the results for the H 2 and HeH + molecules, obtained within the adiabatic TD-PINO formalism with the PILS functional and the extended RPA results with the APSG density matrices. The latter approach has been shown to be equivalent to the adiabatic TD-PINO if the APSG functional is employed [165] and has been tested on several small molecules. Even though it recovers certain double excitations, its overall accuracy is not satisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the APSG wavefunction can also be used to construct a PINO functional (62). The adiabatic PINO response equations with the APSG functional are actually identical to those obtained by applying time-dependent response theory to the APSG wavefunction directly [165]. Calculations on small molecular systems have demonstrated that the lowest excitation energies for the APSG functional (62) are in very good agreement with more sophisticated approaches.…”
Section: Phase Including Natural Orbitalsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The lack of double excitations in ERPA has much lesser effect on the E (2) disp component-errors with respect to FCI remain in the 8 − 30% range for the He· · · H 2 ( 1 Σ + u ) state of the dimer, and in the 7 − 12% range for the He· · · H 2 ( 1 Π u ) state (see Figure S1 and Table S2 in the Supporting Information). Taking into account that E (2) exch−disp is small in comparison to E (2) disp , and also the fact that the overall contribution from double excitations is expected to be less pronounced for many-electron systems than for the hydrogen molecule, 36 one can still expect that the proposed ERPA-based approximations will prove useful when applied to dispersion interactions in excited systems.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%