Household secondary attack rate of COVID-19 and associated determinants in Guangzhou, China: a retrospective cohort study

Abstract

Background As of June 8, 2020, the global reported number of COVID-19 cases had reached more than 7 million with over 400 000 deaths. The household transmissibility of the causative pathogen, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), remains unclear. We aimed to estimate the secondary attack rate of SARS-CoV-2 among household and non-household close contacts in Guangzhou, China, using a statistical transmission model. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, we used a comprehensive contact tracing dataset from the Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention to estimate the secondary attack rate of COVID-19 (defined as the probability that an infected individual will transmit the disease to a susceptible individual) among household and non-household contacts, using a statistical transmission model. We considered two alternative definitions of household contacts in the analysis: individuals who were either family members or close relatives, such as parents and parents-in-law, regardless of residential address, and individuals living at the same address regardless of relationship. We assessed the demographic determinants of transmissibility and the infectivity of COVID-19 cases during their incubation period. Findings Between Jan 7, 2020, and Feb 18, 2020, we traced 195 unrelated close contact groups (215 primary cases, 134 secondary or tertiary cases, and 1964 uninfected close contacts). By identifying households from these groups, assuming a mean incubation period of 5 days, a maximum infectious period of 13 days, and no case isolation, the estimated secondary attack rate among household contacts was 12·4% (95% CI 9·8–15·4) when household contacts were defined on the basis of close relatives and 17·1% (13·3–21·8) when household contacts were defined on the basis of residential address. Compared with the oldest age group (≥60 years), the risk of household infection was lower in the youngest age group (<20 years; odds ratio [OR] 0·23 [95% CI 0·11–0·46]) and among adults aged 20–59 years (OR 0·64 [95% CI 0·43–0·97]). Our results suggest greater infectivity during the incubation period than during the symptomatic period, although differences were not statistically significant (OR 0·61 [95% CI 0·27–1·38]). The estimated local reproductive number ( R ) based on observed contact frequencies of primary cases was 0·5 (95% CI 0·41–0·62) in Guangzhou. The projected local R , had there been no isolation of cases or quarantine of their contacts, was 0·6 (95% CI 0·49–0·74) when household was defined on the basis of close relatives. Interpretation SARS-CoV-2 is more transmissible in households than SARS-CoV and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Older individuals (aged ≥60 years) are the most susceptible to household transmission of SARS-CoV-2. In addition to case finding and isolation, timely tracing and quarantine of close contac...

The Recommended and Excessive Preventive Behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Community-Based Online Survey in China

“…To the best of our knowledge, most of the previous studies had shown that demographic characteristics are often associated with preventive behaviors during epidemics of infectious diseases such as influenza [ 18 ] or COVID-19 [ 19 , 20 ]. Taking this into account, various psychosocial methods, such as the Health Belief Model (HBM), the Stages of Change Model, and the Social Cognition Model, are proposed to predict the practice of preventive behavior at the individual level.…”

Ultrafast Screening of COVID-19 by Machine Learning Analysis of Exhaled NO

“…The random forest method was used for feature engineering. As shown in Figure 2A, age, which has been reported to be highly related to COVID-19 in the literature, plays an important role in the COVID-19 classi cation 25 . The most important information in Figure 2A is that FeNO is con rmed to play an essential role in supporting our speculation.…”

COVID-19 epidemic monitoring after non-pharmaceutical interventions: The use of time-varying reproduction number in a country with a large migrant population

“…A study from the UK found that a 74% reduction in the average daily number of contacts observed per participant (from 10.8 to 2.8) would be sufficient to reduce R t from 2.6 prior to lockdown to 0.62 (95% CI 0.37-0.89) after the lockdown, based on all types of contact (Jarvis et al, 2020). Another study from China also found that transmission of COVID-19 was prominent in family clusters (Jing et al, 2020).…”