2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.07.06.498992
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Host-specific plasmid evolution explains the variable spread of clinical antibiotic-resistance plasmids

Abstract: Antibiotic resistance encoded on plasmids is a pressing global health problem. Predicting which plasmids spread/decline in the long term remains a huge challenge, even though some key parameters influencing plasmid stability have been identified, such as plasmid growth costs and horizontal transfer rates. Here, we show these parameters evolve in a strain-specific way among clinical plasmids/bacteria, and this occurs rapidly enough to alter the relative likelihoods of different bacterium-plasmid combinations sp… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, these evolutionary responses can be more extensive, involving coadaptation of the chromosome and plasmid, whereby multiple mutations occurring on both replicons are necessary to assimilate the plasmid into the genome ( 17 19 ). To date, few studies have compared the evolutionary responses of diverse lineages to acquiring a new plasmid at the genomic level ( 16 , 19 , 20 ). As such little is known about how the evolutionary processes of genomic integration of an MDR plasmid vary between genomically diverse bacterial lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, these evolutionary responses can be more extensive, involving coadaptation of the chromosome and plasmid, whereby multiple mutations occurring on both replicons are necessary to assimilate the plasmid into the genome ( 17 19 ). To date, few studies have compared the evolutionary responses of diverse lineages to acquiring a new plasmid at the genomic level ( 16 , 19 , 20 ). As such little is known about how the evolutionary processes of genomic integration of an MDR plasmid vary between genomically diverse bacterial lineages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the leading regions of plasmids belonging to a wide range of incompatibility groups (IncF, IncN, IncP9 and IncW) classified as MOBF plasmids using the relaxase as a phylogenetic marker were reported to be the preferential target for CRISPR-Cas systems directed against conjugation 8,91,92 . Recently, the leading region was shown to be an important evolutionary target for the dissemination of the pESBL (IncI) plasmid 93 . Concerning the F plasmid, we can stress that Frpo1 and Frpo2 share 92% similarity at the nucleotide level and are located only about 5 kb apart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the leading regions of plasmids belonging to a wide range of incompatibility groups (IncF, IncN, IncP9 and IncW) classified as MOBF plasmids using the relaxase as a phylogenetic marker were reported to be the preferential target for CRISPR-Cas systems directed against conjugation (Fernandez-Lopez et al, 2016; Garcillán-Barcia et al, 2009; Westra et al, 2013). Recently, the leading region was shown to be an important evolutionary target for the dissemination of the pESLB (IncI) plasmid (Benz and Hall, 2022). Concerning the F plasmid, we can stress that F rpo1 and F rpo2 share 92 % similarity at the nucleotide level and are located only about 5 kb apart.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%