2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004gl021897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Horizontal coseismic deformation of the 2003 Bam (Iran) earthquake measured from SPOT‐5 THR satellite imagery

Abstract: [1] On 26 December 2003, a destructive Mw 6.5 earthquake occurred in Kerman province, Iran, killing more than 30,000 people around the ancient city of Bam. We map the fault zone and determine the slip distribution using sub-pixel correlation of images taken by the SPOT-5 THR sensor before and after the main shock. Our results show that the surface displacement occurred on a blind fault oriented N174 and located South of Bam. A 15 km along-strike profile depicts a distribution with a maximum displacement of 1.2… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
34
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(18 reference statements)
1
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technique is now widely used to monitor the earth surface changes and dynamics [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. As richer and constantly updated satellite observation data become available, the application of optical images cross-correlation technique has been expanded to fields such as glacier flow velocity extraction [10][11][12], quantification of sand dune migration [13][14][15], terrain-deformation measurements of slow landslides [16], monitoring process of significant rift events [17], volcanic monitoring [18] and particularly extensive coseismic deformation extraction [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The technique is now widely used to monitor the earth surface changes and dynamics [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. As richer and constantly updated satellite observation data become available, the application of optical images cross-correlation technique has been expanded to fields such as glacier flow velocity extraction [10][11][12], quantification of sand dune migration [13][14][15], terrain-deformation measurements of slow landslides [16], monitoring process of significant rift events [17], volcanic monitoring [18] and particularly extensive coseismic deformation extraction [19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies demonstrate that the Landsat 8 image cross-correlation technique has advantages in measuring surface deformation, such as mapping ice sheet velocity [26], coseismic deformation extraction [25,[27][28][29] and volcano deformation monitoring [30]. Many researchers have done a lot of analyses and error source correction of displacement measurement, but they mainly focused on a few data sources, such as SPOT, ASTER, HiRISE (High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment) and aerial imagery [3,8,11,[13][14][15][16][17][19][20][21]31,32]. In general, the deformation field obtained by different types of optical sensors with cross-correlation technique has disparities in error structure and magnitude level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of course state of the art methods propose various ad-hoc indicators of local correlation or matching quality as in [3], but we wish to propose a quantitative error estimate rather than qualitative measures that are, in practice, difficult to interpret. We keep in mind the use of the estimated deformation fields as inputs to a subsequent analysis algorithms (for instance inversion methods to derive the 3D fault structure and coseismic slip distribution from surface displacements in the case of earthquakes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fault mechanics and geometry), future earthquake recurrence and seismic hazard assessment (Leprince et al, 2007;Kaneda et al, 2008). Moreover, these measurements also assist in interpretation of morphotectonic features in other earthquake prone areas for preparing seismic hazard maps (Binet and Bollinger, 2005;Kaneda et al, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using remote sensing data, displacement field can be measured by comparison of pre-and post-earthquake images. These displacements can be calculated either by using Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) Interferometry (Massonnet et al, 1993;Taylor et al, 2008) or by offsets tracking with sub-pixel correlation of SAR amplitude Fialko et al, 2005;Pathier et al, 2006) or optical images (Crippen, 1992;van Puymbroeck et al, 2000;Dominguez et al, 2003;Binet and Bollinger, 2005;Leprince et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%