Home‐Made Oral Rehydration Solutions: Variations in Composition

Fontana, Massimo; Decorti, Giuliana; Paccagnini, S.; Palmieri, M; Beretta, P.; Principi, Nicola

doi:10.1111/j.1651-2227.1991.tb11935.x

Cited by 3 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 5 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Most other reports of trials of homemade ORS preparation are from poor countries, where wide ranges of accuracy in solution sodium concentration have been found. 18,[22][23][24] Few such studies have been reported from industrialized countries; studies from Italy 25 and England 26 have shown a high variability of homemade sugar-salt ORS. The greater accuracy of the parents in our study may be attributable to the fact that they had been instructed personally in solution preparation by a nurse in addition to having received written instructions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Safety and Effectiveness of Homemade and Reconstituted Packet Cereal-based Oral Rehydration Solutions: A Randomized Clinical Trial

et al. 1997

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ABSTRACT. Objectives. Parents may be deterred from obtaining commercial oral rehydration solutions (ORS) for their young children with acute diarrheal disease because of its availability and/or cost, especially if they are poor. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine 1) whether low-income parents could safely mix and administer cereal-based ORS (CBORS) both from ingredients commonly found in the home and from a premixed packet; 2) whether these CBORS were as effective in maintaining hydration as commercial glucose-based ORS; and 3) whether CBORS were more effective in reducing severity and duration of illness.Methods. Children 4 to 36 months of age discharged from emergency departments and health centers with acute diarrheal disease were randomized to receive either homemade CBORS, reconstituted packet CBORS, or Pedialyte. A study nurse saw the child at home each day until the illness resolved, and obtained capillary blood for serum sodium at enrollment and at 24 to 48 hours; a sample of CBORS for sodium concentration; stool for pathogen analysis; and daily fluid intake, stool frequency, and weight.Results. A total of 232 children were enrolled, of whom 203 (88%) completed the study. Two parents (3%) in the homemade CBORS group and one parent (1%) in the packet CBORS group made mixing errors resulting in a high sodium concentration (>100 mEq/L); their children refused the solution and had normal serum sodium values. Mean CBORS sodium concentration for the remainder of the homemade CBORS group was 60 ؎ 10 mEq/L, and for the packet CBORS group, 54 ؎ 13. Eighteen children (11%) had abnormal serum sodium values at presentation, which returned to normal in all groups in most cases. Three children (4.5%) in the homemade CBORS group, 4 (6%) in the packet CBORS group, and 1 child (1.4%) in the Pedialyte group failed therapy.Children refused to take homemade CBORS and packet CBORS (43% and 32%, respectively) more often than Pedialyte (9%), and those in the CBORS groups tended to take less ORS and total fluids. There were no significant differences among the three groups in incidence of daily vomiting or stooling, duration of diarrhea, or weight gain.Conclusions. CBORS do not offer a clinically significant advantage over glucose-based ORS. Homemade CBORS represent a treatment option in carefully selected cases, but it is not the safest alternative for regular clinical use. Pediatrics 1997;100(5). URL: http://www. pediatrics.org/cgi/content/full/100/5/e3; diarrhea, dehydration, oral rehydration, cereal.

show abstract