1984
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(84)80969-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Home care for life-supported persons: An approach to program development

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Children were classified for this pur¬ pose into five categories: (1) normal, if they had no developmental delay, were able to function independently, and were in a regular school with adequate performance; (2) borderline, if develop¬ ment was at or just below the lower limits of normal (school-aged children who could function in a regular school classroom, but needed special assist¬ ance in one or more subjects); (3) mildly delayed, when there were obvious delays in motor and adaptive skills and speech (school-aged children who re¬ quired special classrooms or special schools and were expected to live inde¬ pendently); (4) moderately delayed, when they were clearly retarded in their development and expected to re¬ quire supervision in a sheltered envi¬ ronment; and (5) severely delayed children who had profound mental re¬ tardation and were expected to be to¬ tally dependent throughout their lives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children were classified for this pur¬ pose into five categories: (1) normal, if they had no developmental delay, were able to function independently, and were in a regular school with adequate performance; (2) borderline, if develop¬ ment was at or just below the lower limits of normal (school-aged children who could function in a regular school classroom, but needed special assist¬ ance in one or more subjects); (3) mildly delayed, when there were obvious delays in motor and adaptive skills and speech (school-aged children who re¬ quired special classrooms or special schools and were expected to live inde¬ pendently); (4) moderately delayed, when they were clearly retarded in their development and expected to re¬ quire supervision in a sheltered envi¬ ronment; and (5) severely delayed children who had profound mental re¬ tardation and were expected to be to¬ tally dependent throughout their lives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children needing chronic respiratory support should be discharged home from hospitals to minimise disruptions to their development and family life, 1 to prevent dependence on institutions, to avoid nosocomial infections, to liberate precious‐resource hospital beds and to reduce costs 2–5 . Home respiratory support programmes exist in North America, 2,6–10 Britain, 11 Europe, 12–19 Japan, 20 Australia 21 and New Zealand 22 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transfusions of blood and blood products, 26 parenteral nutrition, 27 antibiotic therapy, 28 chemotherapy, 29 and anticoagulant infusions 30 are all in common use. Portable home oxygen has been available for some years, but now patients may be managed at home on a portable ventilator 31 . Other available treatments include home dialysis, 32 phototherapy, 33 and pain management with epidural and subcutaneous morphine using automated delivery systems 34 .…”
Section: Home Care —Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%