1971
DOI: 10.1215/kjm/1250523693
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Holomorphic differentials on open Riemann surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

1980
1980
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, we emphasize the following ones:• A Gunning-Narasimhan type theorem for non-orientable conformal surfaces.• An existence theorem for non-orientable minimal surfaces in R 3 , with arbitrary conformal structure, properly projecting into a plane. • An existence result for non-orientable minimal surfaces in R 3 with arbitrary conformal structure and Gauss map omitting one projective direction.Finally, in a different line of applications, we prove an extension of the classical Gunning-Narasimhan theorem [18] (see also [21]); more specifically, we show that, for any open Riemann surface N and any antiholomorphic involution I : N → N without fixed points, there exist holomorphic 1-forms ϑ on N with I * ϑ = ϑ and prescribed periods and canonical divisor (see Theorem 6.4).Outline of the paper. The necessary notation and background on non-orientable minimal surfaces in R 3 is introduced in Sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among them, we emphasize the following ones:• A Gunning-Narasimhan type theorem for non-orientable conformal surfaces.• An existence theorem for non-orientable minimal surfaces in R 3 , with arbitrary conformal structure, properly projecting into a plane. • An existence result for non-orientable minimal surfaces in R 3 with arbitrary conformal structure and Gauss map omitting one projective direction.Finally, in a different line of applications, we prove an extension of the classical Gunning-Narasimhan theorem [18] (see also [21]); more specifically, we show that, for any open Riemann surface N and any antiholomorphic involution I : N → N without fixed points, there exist holomorphic 1-forms ϑ on N with I * ϑ = ϑ and prescribed periods and canonical divisor (see Theorem 6.4).Outline of the paper. The necessary notation and background on non-orientable minimal surfaces in R 3 is introduced in Sec.…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Finally, in a different line of applications, we prove an extension of the classical Gunning-Narasimhan theorem [18] (see also [21]); more specifically, we show that, for any open Riemann surface N and any antiholomorphic involution I : N → N without fixed points, there exist holomorphic 1-forms ϑ on N with I * ϑ = ϑ and prescribed periods and canonical divisor (see Theorem 6.4).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our goal in this paper is to show that a closed holomorphic 1-form without zeros can be chosen in every cohomology class. (See also [14] for open Riemann surfaces.) Theorem 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(b) Take Y = C * ⊂ C, let θ be a holomorphic 1-form on X with divisor D, and apply Corollary 2(b). (The existence of such a form does not rely on [10]. It is an immediate consequence of [4,Satz 4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Gunning and Narasimhan showed that the zero class contains a holomorphic form with no zeros [9]. In other words, there is a holomorphic immersion X → C. Kusunoki and Sainouchi generalised these two theorems and proved that both the periods and the divisor of a holomorphic form on X can be prescribed arbitrarily [10,Theorem 1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%