2008
DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0417
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Hitting the buffers: conspecific aggression undermines benefits of colonial breeding under adverse conditions

Abstract: Colonial breeding in birds is widely considered to benefit individuals through enhanced protection against predators or transfer of information about foraging sites. This view, however, is largely based on studies of seabirds carried out under favourable conditions. Recent breeding failures at many seabird colonies in the UK provide an opportunity to re-examine costs and benefits of coloniality under adverse conditions. Common guillemots Uria aalge are highly colonial cliff-nesting seabirds with very flexible … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(17 reference statements)
1
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, an environmental stressor such as an increased threat of predation promotes cooperation (cooperative mobbing or brood care) in several bird species living in small groups (e.g., Pied Flycatcher: Krams et al., 2010; Common Eider, Somateria mollissima : Jaatinen, Ost, & Lehikoinen, 2011). This is in contrast to the noncooperative social species, such as colonially breeding sea birds, where environmental stressors that increase GCs mainly increase aggression and reduce social behavior (Common Guillemot, Uria aalge , Ashbrook, Wanless, Harris, & Hamer, 2008). …”
Section: Evidence That Variation In Stress Physiology Is Associated Wmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Similarly, an environmental stressor such as an increased threat of predation promotes cooperation (cooperative mobbing or brood care) in several bird species living in small groups (e.g., Pied Flycatcher: Krams et al., 2010; Common Eider, Somateria mollissima : Jaatinen, Ost, & Lehikoinen, 2011). This is in contrast to the noncooperative social species, such as colonially breeding sea birds, where environmental stressors that increase GCs mainly increase aggression and reduce social behavior (Common Guillemot, Uria aalge , Ashbrook, Wanless, Harris, & Hamer, 2008). …”
Section: Evidence That Variation In Stress Physiology Is Associated Wmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…At the HDP (approx. 32 sites per square metre; 99 chicks in 2007; 98 chicks in 2008), most breeding birds were in physical contact with two or more neighbours (Ashbrook et al 2008). By contrast, at the LDP (less than five sites per square metre; 31 chicks in 2007; 29 chicks in 2008), birds bred singly, or in small groups.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ferrer & Penteriani 2008;Kramer et al 2009), but can also occur within larger populations when higher local density leads to an increase in individual fitness, notably through collective defence against predators (Clode 1993;Cô té 2000). Where such positive density dependence occurs, it is likely that individuals in dense aggregations are still competing with each other for resources (Lewis et al 2001;Elliott et al 2009) or otherwise interacting negatively (Ashbrook et al 2008). Hence, the net balance between such positive and negative effects of increasing density is likely to vary depending on environmental conditions (Kitaysky et al 2000;Lewis et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A breeding failure of North Sea murres was also partly explained by diet shifts and low quality of prey (Wanless et al 2005). However, at the same time, food availability decreased, and the combined impact resulted in unprecedented low breeding success during several consecutive breeding seasons (Ashbrook et al 2008(Ashbrook et al , 2010. Top predators may thus be influenced simultaneously by changes in both food quantity and quality, and this may affect different components of reproduction and survival.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%