2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2007.05.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History of safe use as applied to the safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from genetically modified organisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Constable et al (2007), the history of safe use of traditional foods constitutes the reference point for the comparative safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from GMO. In the case of proteins derived from plants, the latter becomes the source of comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to Constable et al (2007), the history of safe use of traditional foods constitutes the reference point for the comparative safety assessment of novel foods and foods derived from GMO. In the case of proteins derived from plants, the latter becomes the source of comparison.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A literature review on the history of safe use (HOSU) of M. oleifera species, source of the Mo-CBP 3 protein, was performed according to the principles described by Constable et al (2007). For that search, the PubMed database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ pubmed/) was accessed, using the following combination of keywords: (a) "Moringa oleifera" and "food safety"; (b) "Moringa oleifera" and "risk assessment"; (c) "Moringa oleifera" and "toxicity"; (d) "Moringa oleifera" and "nutrition"; (e) "Moringa oleifera" and "review"; and (f) "Moringa oleifera".…”
Section: History Of Safe Use Of M Oleifera Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Food safety of GM foods must be rigorously evaluated before their applications in the food industry, which includes studies of toxicity (genotoxicity, acute toxicity, subchronic toxicity and inhalation) and potential allergenicity. If a GM food is compared with its traditional counterpart and does not present any determined specific differences, the food will at least be as safe as the traditional counterpart (Constable et al, 2007). In the future works, the safety evaluation of rPMEI should be further researched as well as applicability of the proposed solution for real food systems, including the sensorial effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consideration of the 'history of use' (Constable et al, 2007) of a protein source, or a traditional food, is useful to provide important background information on how to develop a strategy for assessing the potential to elicit an allergic reaction, and to provide clues for optimal risk management. A history of safe use describes the existing safety profile including any known health effects, patterns of use, processing properties and protein characteristics.…”
Section: Background Information: History Of (Safe) Usementioning
confidence: 99%