History and Heritage of Coastal Engineering 1996
DOI: 10.1061/9780784401965.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

History and Heritage of German Coastal Engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the gauge records (Figure 1), the 1872 storm stands out as a singularity, and there are large differences in the estimates of the return period. Estimates of the return period on the German Baltic coast range from 180-200 years [38], 1000-2500 years [15], up to 3400-10,000 years [39]. In Sweden, the return period was estimated to 7000 years using a generalized extreme value (GEV) model based on 100 years of water level observations [33].…”
Section: Physical Description Of the 1872 Stormmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the gauge records (Figure 1), the 1872 storm stands out as a singularity, and there are large differences in the estimates of the return period. Estimates of the return period on the German Baltic coast range from 180-200 years [38], 1000-2500 years [15], up to 3400-10,000 years [39]. In Sweden, the return period was estimated to 7000 years using a generalized extreme value (GEV) model based on 100 years of water level observations [33].…”
Section: Physical Description Of the 1872 Stormmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the profiles of the dykes became more optimised to dissipate wave energy, the falling edges of the dykes became less steep and the base lines broadened. Today, the base line width of main dykes easily amounts to up to 100 m (Niemeyer et al, 1996). case-by-case basis whether or not an EIA has to be carried out for the specific project.…”
Section: Building Consensus On An Amendment Of the State Law On Dykesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ever since, keeping dikes in order was a challenge, and keeping the dangers of storm surges at bay was an important community task, the activity of which can nowadays partly be reconstructed by studying costs to repair dikes in historical times (de Kraker 1999). A more modern account of the history of managing the risk of storm surges along the North Sea coast is provided by Niemeyer et al (1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One fragmentation is due to the different disciplines involved, chiefly, coastal engineering (e.g., Niemeyer et al 1995) and oceanography. The other is related to the relatively small scale of storm surges, so that the problem is perceived as a regional problem, and scientific insights and methods developed for one part in the world do not necessarily find their way into other parts affected by storm surges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%