2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2020.06.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathological grading affects survival in patients with IDH-mutant grade II and grade III diffuse gliomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the malignant gliomas, there are lower grade gliomas (LGGs) which include grade II and grade III gliomas. Besides molecular characteristics, histopathological grade can also affect the prognosis of the LGG patients, leading to the enormous variability in survival outcomes [ 30 ]. It is, therefore, important to identify prognostic biomarkers of LGG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the malignant gliomas, there are lower grade gliomas (LGGs) which include grade II and grade III gliomas. Besides molecular characteristics, histopathological grade can also affect the prognosis of the LGG patients, leading to the enormous variability in survival outcomes [ 30 ]. It is, therefore, important to identify prognostic biomarkers of LGG.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different diffuse glioma types lead to different prognosis and treatment methods. Researchers showed that greater grading was associated with poorer prognosis and was an independent prognostic factor in IDH-mutant grade II and grade III gliomas ( 3 ). Gliomas grading and molecular characteristics all should be considered into patients’ management for improving prognosis ( 4 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We made this decision due to the conflicting currently contested role of tumor grade on prognosis estimation. Indeed, in our previous report, the tumor grade seemed to affect the prognosis of patients with glioma, while other studies did not confirm this finding [32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%