1989
DOI: 10.1159/000248091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histopathological Discriminant Criteria between Lichenoid Drug Eruption and Idiopathic Lichen planus: Retrospective Study on Selected Samples

Abstract: The lesions observed in 15 idiopathic lichen planus (ILP) skin biopsies were compared with those occurring in 15 clinically relevant lichenoid drug eruptions (LDE). Various histopathological features were taken into account. Statistical analysis of results showed that none of these can be considered as a significant criterium allowing a pathognomonic differential diagnosis between ILP and LDE. Nevertheless, a strong suggestion of drug etiology can be inferred when the following histopathological signs (‘LDE-re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
62
1
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
62
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Sometimes, there does seem to be a tendency for these oral lesions to be unilateral (Lamey et al, 1995) and erosive (Potts et al, 1987), but these features are by no means invariable. Histology may help; lichenoid lesions may have a more diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate and contain eosinophils and plasma cells, and there may be more colloid bodies than in classic LP, but there are no specific features (Van den Haute et al, 1989), and immunostaining is usually non-contributory, though basal cell cytoplasmic antibodies may be found (Lamey et at., 1995) albeit less reliably than in cutaneous drug reactions (Van Joost, 1974;McOueen and Behan, 1982;Gibson et al, 1986;Watanabe et al, 1991 (Eisen, 1993a)? (4) INFECTIOUS AGENTS Oral LP has been suggested to be related to bacteria such as a Gram-negative anaerobic bacillus (Jacob and Helmbold, 1933) and spirochetes (Lehnhoff, 1948), but this has not been confirmed (Postma, 1937;Fry and Withers, 1969). Lichenoid reactions have been seen in syphilis (Lochner and Pomeranz, 1974), chronic bladder infection (Shelley and Shelley, 1989), and intestinal amebiasis (Wahba-Yahav, 1989), though in both latter cases the lesions appeared to clear following metronidazole treatment.…”
Section: (3) Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes, there does seem to be a tendency for these oral lesions to be unilateral (Lamey et al, 1995) and erosive (Potts et al, 1987), but these features are by no means invariable. Histology may help; lichenoid lesions may have a more diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate and contain eosinophils and plasma cells, and there may be more colloid bodies than in classic LP, but there are no specific features (Van den Haute et al, 1989), and immunostaining is usually non-contributory, though basal cell cytoplasmic antibodies may be found (Lamey et at., 1995) albeit less reliably than in cutaneous drug reactions (Van Joost, 1974;McOueen and Behan, 1982;Gibson et al, 1986;Watanabe et al, 1991 (Eisen, 1993a)? (4) INFECTIOUS AGENTS Oral LP has been suggested to be related to bacteria such as a Gram-negative anaerobic bacillus (Jacob and Helmbold, 1933) and spirochetes (Lehnhoff, 1948), but this has not been confirmed (Postma, 1937;Fry and Withers, 1969). Lichenoid reactions have been seen in syphilis (Lochner and Pomeranz, 1974), chronic bladder infection (Shelley and Shelley, 1989), and intestinal amebiasis (Wahba-Yahav, 1989), though in both latter cases the lesions appeared to clear following metronidazole treatment.…”
Section: (3) Drugsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Varying degrees of cytologic atypia is present [18]. Compared to OLP, the malignant transformation rate is reportedly higher in oral lichenoid lesions that do not have all the typical clinical and histologic features of OLP [20]. These studies again emphasize the importance of both clinical and pathologic correlation in making the diagnosis of oral lichen planus.…”
Section: Oral Lichenoid Contact Reactionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Oral lichenoid lesions (aLL) resemble oral lichen planus clinically and histologically and have been attributed to various drugs, foodstuff and dental materials. The WHO criteria for lichen planus do not differentiate between the two conditions, although it has been suggested that OLL has a more diffuse lymphocytic infiltrate containing eosinophils with perivascular infiltration (1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%