Histologic Correlates of Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Images

Kimmey, Michael B.; Martin, Roy W.; Haggitt, Rodger C.; Wang, K.Y.; Franklin, D.; Silverstein, Fred E.

doi:10.1016/0016-5085(89)91568-0

Cited by 434 publications

(153 citation statements)

References 20 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

133

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…If patients drink water prior to undergoing a US scan, the gastric wall is visualized as a five-layered structure (21). Loss of stratification indicates destruction of the normal structure of the gastric wall.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detection of gastric cancer using transabdominal ultrasonography is associated with tumor diameter and depth of invasion

Tomizawa

Shinozaki

Fugo

et al. 2015

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract. Gastric cancer is occasionally diagnosed using transabdominal ultrasonography (US) during screening or investigation of patients with abdominal symptoms. Therefore, the present study analyzed the association of the tumor diameter, pathological T (pT) staging and depth of invasion with the detection of gastric cancer using US. Patient records were analyzed retrospectively and 13 patients were enrolled, who underwent US screening prior to endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection or surgery. In total, 5 patients were diagnosed with gastric cancer using US (positive detection group), while US was unable to detect the gastric cancer in 8 patients (negative detection group). The tumor diameter and depth of invasion were determined by pathologists. One-way analysis of variance or the χ 2 test was performed. Wall thickness in gastric cancer cases ranged between 7 and 20 mm (mean, 12.2±5.9 mm), as measured using abdominal US. The hemoglobin level was significantly lower in the positive detection patients compared with the negative detection patients (P=0.0455). In addition, the diameters of the gastric wall in the negative and positive detection patients were 24.5±16.4 and 54.4±26.2 mm, respectively (P=0.0266). These results indicate that gastric cancer in the positive detection patients were at a more advanced-stage compared with that in the negative detection patients. Furthermore, gastric cancer with a stage over pT2 was diagnosed using abdominal US (P=0.0242), whereas stage pT1a gastric cancer was not detected by abdominal US. Gastric tumors invading deeper than the submucosa were diagnosed using US (P=0.0242). However, the gastric cancer cases limited to the mucosa remained undetected. In conclusion, the detection of gastric cancer correlated well with the tumor diameter, pT staging and depth of invasion.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Detection of gastric cancer using transabdominal ultrasonography is associated with tumor diameter and depth of invasion

Tomizawa

Shinozaki

Fugo

et al. 2015

Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The anatomic correlates of these layers were demonstrated by careful comparison of US images of excised human GI tissue to the histology of the exact area of tissue [10].…”

Section: Interpretation Of Gi Ultrasound Imagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…This is due to the interface echo stripe from the boundary between the submucosa and the muscularis propria that adds thickness to the submucosal layer on the images and detracts from the thickness of the muscularis propria layer. The thickness of this interface echo is related to the axial resolution of the US transducer and is only approximately 300 µ with the high-frequency transducers used in ES [10]. The muscularis mucosae also adds thickness to the third US layer, as the normal muscularis mucosae is thinner than the interface echoes and therefore is obscured by this interface echo between the lamina propria and the muscularis mucosae, which then blends with the echoes from the underlying Review submucosa [11].…”

Section: Interpretation Of Gi Ultrasound Imagesmentioning

confidence: 99%

High-frequency ultrasonographic imaging of the gastrointestinal wall

Ødegaard

Nesje

Lærum

et al. 2012

Expert Review of Medical Devices

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…[24][25][26] Nu me ro usaut horsha vecle arlyemp ha si zedwall thic ke ningasakeyso nog rap hicfe a tu reindi ag nosisofgas tro in tes ti nalle si ons. [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] Weme a su redgastric wall thick nes ses wit ho ut wa ter in ges ti on firstly.However,weco uldnotob ta insa tis fac tory ima ges.Itwasverydif fi culttoeva lu a tepos te ri or wallandfun dus.Wa terser vesasanaco us ticwindowtoob ta inbet terima gesanditbe co mespos sib letoeva lu a tepos te ri orwallsandfun duscle arly. Ourstudyal sopre sentsfirstava i lab leda taforthe an te ri orandpos te ri orgas tricwallthick nes sesof an trum,cor pusandfun dusse pa ra telyde tec tedby HGSinfunc ti o naldyspep si apa ti entsandhe althy in di vi du als.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparison of Gastric Wall Thicknesses with Hydrogastric Sonography in Functional Dyspepsia Patients

Akfirat¹,

Kayaoğlu²,

Özkan³

et al. 2010

Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

nthe60%ofpa ti entswithup perab do mi nalpa inordis com fort,es tablish mentofacli ni caldi ag no siswhichco uldexp la inthesymptomsis notpos sib leevenwithin va si vedi ag nos ticpro ce du res,andthisen tityis TurkiyeKlinikleriJMedSci2010;30(3) 1061 ComparisonofGastricWallThicknesses withHydrogastricSonography inFunctionalDyspepsiaPatients ABS TRACTObjective:Be ca u setheeti o logyandpat hoph ysi o logyofthefunc ti o naldyspep si are mainsunc le ar,theop ti malma na ge mentisstillcon tro ver si al.Thisstudywasai medtode ter mi nethe ac tu algas tricwallthick nes sesinthesub gro upsoffunc ti o naldyspep si apa ti ents,andtoin ves ti ga te whetherthe rewasanycor re la ti onwiththesymptoms.MaterialandMet hods:Func ti o naldyspepsi apa ti ents(n=136)we redi vi dedin tosixgro upsinre gardtothepre do mi nantsymptom;asgro up 2:epi gas tricdis com fort;gro up3:epi gas tricpa in;gro up4:na u se a;gro up5:vo mi ting;gro up6:blo a tingandgro up7:earlysa ti ety.Con trolgro upwasse lec tedfromthepa ti entswhoun der wentul traso nog rap hicexa mi na ti onforgyne co lo gicoruri naryre a sonsandhadnogas tro in tes ti nalsymptoms (gro up1).Thepa ti entswe rein ves ti ga tedbyhydrogastricsonographyfol lo wingcon ven ti o naltran sab do mi nalso nog raphy.Sa mein de pen dentra di o lo gistblindtothesymptoms,me a su redthethicknes sesofan te ri orandpos te ri orgas tricwallsinfun dus,cor pusandan trum.Re sults:An te ri orand pos te ri orfun duswallswe rede tec tedassig ni fi cantlythic ke nedingro ups2and7(p<0.05).Boththe an te ri orandthepos te ri orwallsofthecor pusandan trumwe refo undsig ni fi cantlythic kerthan theot hergro upsinthegro up3(p<0.05).Conc lu si on:Thisstudydo cu men tedsig ni fi cantgas tricwall thick nessdif fe ren cesbet we enthesub gro upsofthefunc ti o naldyspep si apa ti ents.KeyWords:Dyspep si a;gas tro in tes ti naldi se a ses;ul tra so nog raphy;sto machdi se a ses ÖZETAmaç:Fonk si yo neldis pep si nineti yo lo ji sivepa to fiz yo lo ji siaçıkol ma dı ğın danop ti malte davi sideha lentar tış ma lı dır.Buça lış ma dafonk si yo neldis pep si lihas ta la rınaltgrup la rın dami deduvarka lın lı ğı nıntes pitedi le reksemp to magö refark lı lıkolupol ma dı ğı nınaraş tı rıl ma sıamaç lan mış tır. GereçveYöntemler:Fonk si yo neldis pep sihas ta la rı(n=136)bas kınolansemp to magö realtıgru ba ay rıl dı;grup2:epi gas trikra hat sız lık;grup3:epi gas trikağ rı;grup4:bu lan tı;grup5:kus ma;grup6: şiş kin likvegrup7:er kendoy ma.Kon trolgru buiseji ne ko lo jikve yaüri nerne den ler leul tra so nogra fikin ce le mege rek ti renvehiç birgas tro in tes ti nalsemp to muol ma yanhas ta lar danoluş tu rul du (grup1).Has ta larkon van si yo nelab do mi nalul tra so nog ra fi yita ki benhidrosonografiilede ğer lendi ril di.Semp tom lar danha ber sizbirrad yo logta ra fın danfun dus,kor pusvean trum dami deönvear -kadu varka lın lık la rıöl çül dü.Bul gu lar:Grup2ve7'defun du sunhemönhemdear kadu va rıdi ğer grup lar agörean lam lıde re ce deka lın laş mışidi(p<0.05).Fun dusdu varka lın lı ğıbuikigrupara sın -daiseben...

show abstract

Histologic Correlates of Gastrointestinal Ultrasound Images

Cited by 434 publications

References 20 publications

Detection of gastric cancer using transabdominal ultrasonography is associated with tumor diameter and depth of invasion

Detection of gastric cancer using transabdominal ultrasonography is associated with tumor diameter and depth of invasion

High-frequency ultrasonographic imaging of the gastrointestinal wall

Comparison of Gastric Wall Thicknesses with Hydrogastric Sonography in Functional Dyspepsia Patients

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About