1959
DOI: 10.1002/jmor.1051050102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Histogenesis of hair in the mink and its relationship to dermal fetal fat cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For lipophilic contaminants, increases in the wet‐weight concentration of organisms up a food chain (e.g., wet‐wt BMF > 1) can occur as a simple result of increasing the lipid content of consumers and, thus, may be misconstrued as biomagnification. In the present study, whole‐body mink lipid content [36] was approximately threefold higher than the lipid content of spiked food; thus, a better measure of true biomagnification (e.g., fugacity driven) is the lipid weight‐normalized, or lipid‐weight, BMF [12]. The lipid‐weight BMFs were calculated by dividing the mean lipid‐normalized abdominal fat concentrations by the measured lipid‐normalized food concentrations (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For lipophilic contaminants, increases in the wet‐weight concentration of organisms up a food chain (e.g., wet‐wt BMF > 1) can occur as a simple result of increasing the lipid content of consumers and, thus, may be misconstrued as biomagnification. In the present study, whole‐body mink lipid content [36] was approximately threefold higher than the lipid content of spiked food; thus, a better measure of true biomagnification (e.g., fugacity driven) is the lipid weight‐normalized, or lipid‐weight, BMF [12]. The lipid‐weight BMFs were calculated by dividing the mean lipid‐normalized abdominal fat concentrations by the measured lipid‐normalized food concentrations (Table 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be explained by being the period in which mink kits start-to consume solid food, and thus have to adapt to a situation where they are not solely dependent on the mother's milk production. Another possible explanation could be growth of the summer fur coat, but according to Dolnick (1959) this was first evident at a kit age of 42 days.…”
Section: A H Tausonmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This has resulted in more exact and basic knowledge about hair structure, growth and maturation (i.e., hair follicle activity) throughout the whole hair growth cycle or specified parts of it. The histogenesis of hair in mink, fetal and one to 120 days of age, was studied by Dolnick (1959). Further, the histological determination of different stages of underfur and guard hair growth in mink by counting separately the number of growing and mature hairs was reported by Blomstedt (1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%