2020
DOI: 10.1109/temc.2018.2890447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Highly Accurate and Numerically Stable Matrix Computations of the Internal Impedance of Multilayer Cylindrical Conductors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy of the presented numerical algorithm has been validated by comparing the computation of per-unit-length internal impedance to the authors' closed-form expressions of a twolayer conductor [7]. Furthermore, comparison of per-unit-length internal impedance has also been made with the model based on a cascade of two-port networks presented in [11] where good agreement was found. Also, in this paper, the formula for computing the per-unit-length internal impedance is given, which is derived from the electric field on the surface of the multilayer conductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The accuracy of the presented numerical algorithm has been validated by comparing the computation of per-unit-length internal impedance to the authors' closed-form expressions of a twolayer conductor [7]. Furthermore, comparison of per-unit-length internal impedance has also been made with the model based on a cascade of two-port networks presented in [11] where good agreement was found. Also, in this paper, the formula for computing the per-unit-length internal impedance is given, which is derived from the electric field on the surface of the multilayer conductor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Equations (10)- (11) are valid for both the cases of a solid and tubular multilayer cylindrical conductor.…”
Section: Computation Of Unknown Complex-valued Coefficientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations