2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.11.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-vacuum drains rival conventional underwater-seal drains after pediatric heart surgery

Abstract: Redivac drains are as safe and effective as conventional drains in the pediatric setting, and resulted in a lower incidence of residual pleural effusions requiring drainage. Together with their ease of care, earlier mobilisation of patients and greater cost-effectiveness, the routine use of high-vacuum drains can be recommended following pediatric heart surgery.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The high vacuum was well tolerated in this study. This drainage technique used in pediatric or adult cardiac surgery (instead of conventional underwater‐seal drains) does not have any hemodynamic drawback (except for Norwood stage 1), does not damage surrounding tissue, shortens antibiotic therapy duration, prevents fungal super infection, and results in an overall infection eradication rate of 100% . The technique is also cost‐effective.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high vacuum was well tolerated in this study. This drainage technique used in pediatric or adult cardiac surgery (instead of conventional underwater‐seal drains) does not have any hemodynamic drawback (except for Norwood stage 1), does not damage surrounding tissue, shortens antibiotic therapy duration, prevents fungal super infection, and results in an overall infection eradication rate of 100% . The technique is also cost‐effective.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to address such potential drawbacks of CCDS, a novel high vacuum chest drainage system (HVCDS) has been developed. It can potentially provide the same or eventually superior draining capacity and completeness compared to CCDS while having a smaller cross-sectional diameter, which causes less pain during removal and virtually prevents subcutaneous emphysema [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This drainage is used in pediatric or adult cardiac surgery (instead of conventional underwater-seal drains) without hemodynamic drawback [86] (except for Norwood stage 1) and without damage to surrounding tissue; (4) The high-vacuum avoids any residual cavity and helps filling all of the mediastinum with healthy wellvascularized tissue; (5) Duration of antibiotic therapy is short: 11 d in cases without organ failure and 15 d in patients with organ failure; namely, respiratory failure, renal failure or ECMO; (6) A short antibiotic course is probably the best way to avoid fungal superinfection and to prevent catheter-related complications; (7) The efficiency of the short antibiotic course is due to the efficiency of the mediastinal drainage; (8) The overall infection eradication rate is 100% on a group of 64 patients treated during a 10-year period [5] ; (9) There is no need for sophisticated or expensive material and the technique is not time consuming for the medical staff; and (10) As a result of these advantages, the technique is cost effective.…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%