2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41587-022-01361-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-throughput total RNA sequencing in single cells using VASA-seq

Abstract: Most methods for single-cell transcriptome sequencing amplify the termini of polyadenylated transcripts, capturing only a small fraction of the total cellular transcriptome. This precludes the detection of many long non-coding, short non-coding and non-polyadenylated protein-coding transcripts and hinders alternative splicing analysis. We, therefore, developed VASA-seq to detect the total transcriptome in single cells, which is enabled by fragmenting and tailing all RNA molecules subsequent to cell lysis. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
99
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to bulk total RNA-seq, STORM-seq detects approximately 4,700 (SD = 2,284) fewer genes across sequencing depths of 0.1-1 million reads, suggesting that STORM-seq provides complex libraries in single cells, approaching the complexity achieved in bulk methods ( Figure 1B ). STORM-seq is a full-length, single-cell protocol and we sought to compare how our method compares to recently published, bespoke single-cell total RNA-seq methods, SMART-seq total and VASA-seq 9,21 , as well as a 3’ biased protocol like 10x Genomics. We generated HEK293T single-cell libraries as a common cell type to compare across technologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to bulk total RNA-seq, STORM-seq detects approximately 4,700 (SD = 2,284) fewer genes across sequencing depths of 0.1-1 million reads, suggesting that STORM-seq provides complex libraries in single cells, approaching the complexity achieved in bulk methods ( Figure 1B ). STORM-seq is a full-length, single-cell protocol and we sought to compare how our method compares to recently published, bespoke single-cell total RNA-seq methods, SMART-seq total and VASA-seq 9,21 , as well as a 3’ biased protocol like 10x Genomics. We generated HEK293T single-cell libraries as a common cell type to compare across technologies.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briefly, single-end reads were trimmed using default parameters with the following modifications: 1) --trim-n, 2) --length 18, 3) specifying two adapter sequences as -a AAAAAAAAAA -a TTTTTTTTTT, and 4) --fastqc. VASA-seq data were pre-processed and trimmed using TrimGalore (v0.6.0) and cutadapt (v2.10) using provided scripts in Salmen et al 21 . SMART-seq2 K562 data were trimmed using TrimGalore (v0.6.3).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods outlined to estimate RNA velocity lack extensibility and flexibility to adapt to these more complicated, real-world scenarios. Emerging technologies like VASA-seq 19 , which have greater sensitivity for unspliced RNA detection, may also provide sufficient signal to fit more complex models (e.g., going beyond two promoter states 20 ); thus, a framework is necessary to rapidly test and update model assumptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, many applications require the co-encapsulation of more than one cell/particle into a droplet. For example, for single cell mRNA sequencing [12][13][14] and single-cell secretory analysis [15][16][17], the co-encapsulation of exactly one cell and one functional bead is required; For cell-cell interaction and functional screening, two distinct cell types need to be paired one-to-one in every High precision, high throughput generation of droplets containing single cells droplet [18][19][20][21]; For cell-cell communication profiling, two types of cells plus one or two distinct types of beads are needed to construct an assay in each droplet [22][23][24]. In these cases, the limitation brought by the Poisson distribution is even more pronounced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%