2002
DOI: 10.2514/2.1692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Subsonic Jet Experiments: Turbulence and Noise Generation Studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadly speaking, as the Strouhal number increases from 0.1 to 10, the location of the peak noise moves upstream from x/D ≈ 7 to x/D = 0. This trend is similar to that found in cold subsonic jets by Narayanan et al 5 and by Lee and Bridges. 6 Near Sr = 0.3 both source location plots do a small "zig-zag" that is also noticeable in some of the noise source location plots of Lee and Bridges.…”
Section: Direct Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Broadly speaking, as the Strouhal number increases from 0.1 to 10, the location of the peak noise moves upstream from x/D ≈ 7 to x/D = 0. This trend is similar to that found in cold subsonic jets by Narayanan et al 5 and by Lee and Bridges. 6 Near Sr = 0.3 both source location plots do a small "zig-zag" that is also noticeable in some of the noise source location plots of Lee and Bridges.…”
Section: Direct Resultssupporting
confidence: 79%
“…3 The theoretical foundation of noise source location using cross-correlations of multiple microphone signals was established by Billingsley and Kinns. More recently, frequency-domain approaches for processing the microphone array data were introduced by Humphreys et al 4 Narayanan et al 5 conducted a combined experimental study of the flow characteristics and noise source distribution, using a phased array, of cold and hot subsonic jets. One of the important findings is that the peak noise source is located near the end of the potential core.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 This entails imaging of the noise source with a narrow-aperture array so that the two types of noise sources are not mixed up on a given array measurement. Although a significant number of studies have used microphone arrays to image jet noise, 1,[6][7][8] the array apertures were too large to distinguish between the two types of noise sources. Further, the effects of directivity were not addressed in a consistent manner.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the numerical simulations, since it was deemed computationally too expensive to include the nozzle geometry, laminar shear layers were fed into the domain and randomized velocity fluctuations in the form of a vortex ring were imposed into the jet shear layers. Moreover, it has been observed experimentally 61,62 that high-frequency sources are located a small distance downstream of the jet nozzle and a significant portion of the noise spectrum originates from this near field of the jet. Hence, the high-frequency noise generated in the near-nozzle jet shear layer within a few diameters downstream of the nozzle exit is missing in the current simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%