2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-speed axial impact of aluminum honeycomb – Experiments and simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inc., Japan), which can evaluate velocities from 50 to 2000 m/s and also sense an object more than 5 mm in diameter. This system uses a planar sensor (500 mm × 300 mm) with a long-wavelength IR beam, which is capable of detecting an incident bullet in more detail [28,29]. To confirm whether the incidence bullet was perpendicular to the surface of the bulletproof material, an incidence angle detector was placed in front of the material at a distance of 1.0 m. 15 cm behind the bulletproof material, we placed a 0.5-mm-thick Al witness plate to verify whether the bulletproof material was penetrated [ Fig.…”
Section: Ballistic Impact Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inc., Japan), which can evaluate velocities from 50 to 2000 m/s and also sense an object more than 5 mm in diameter. This system uses a planar sensor (500 mm × 300 mm) with a long-wavelength IR beam, which is capable of detecting an incident bullet in more detail [28,29]. To confirm whether the incidence bullet was perpendicular to the surface of the bulletproof material, an incidence angle detector was placed in front of the material at a distance of 1.0 m. 15 cm behind the bulletproof material, we placed a 0.5-mm-thick Al witness plate to verify whether the bulletproof material was penetrated [ Fig.…”
Section: Ballistic Impact Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these engineering applications, dynamic loadings are often encountered. Under dynamic loading, the response of honeycombs is significantly different from that under static loading [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], and honeycomb structures designed with static properties are usually too conservative and wasteful. Much effort has been made on the in-plane dynamic compressive properties of honeycombs [14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous works have looked into crosssectional shapes [1,4], composite materials [5][6][7], and multi-step energy absorbing devices [8,9]. Thin-walled structures filled with aluminum honeycombs [10][11][12][13][14][15][16] and polymeric or metallic foams [17][18][19][20] as well as multi-cell tubes [21][22][23][24][25] have been suggested for better crashworthiness properties of energy absorbers. Composite materials have also demonstrated the mechanical advantages of crashworthiness over classical metals [26], i.e., crushing energy absorption per unit of mass [27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%