2008
DOI: 10.1109/jlt.2008.923930
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-Speed All-Optical First- and Second-Order Differentiators Based on Cross-Phase Modulation in Fibers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As expected, the filtered waveforms emphasize the pulse edges, and both are narrower than the original input pulse. Unlike previous schemes for all-optical intensity differentiation, which were based on XPM in fiber [19] or cross-gain modulation in semiconductor optical amplifiers [22], the proposed edge detection technique does not require an additional probe input. The shape of the two narrowed replicas can be subtracted from that of the original pulse to generate an UWB waveform, as described next.…”
Section: Self-phase Modulation Based Edge Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As expected, the filtered waveforms emphasize the pulse edges, and both are narrower than the original input pulse. Unlike previous schemes for all-optical intensity differentiation, which were based on XPM in fiber [19] or cross-gain modulation in semiconductor optical amplifiers [22], the proposed edge detection technique does not require an additional probe input. The shape of the two narrowed replicas can be subtracted from that of the original pulse to generate an UWB waveform, as described next.…”
Section: Self-phase Modulation Based Edge Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [18], Li and coauthors used cross-gain modulation in an optical parametric amplifier to generate monocycle and doublet pulse shapes. Velanas et al [19] used a cross-phase-modulation (XPM) based technique to obtain monocycle shapes. Both schemes required two input laser sources.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, but the processing speed was intrinsically limited by the operation bandwidth of the RF delay line. Photonic intensity differentiators based on semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) and optical filters (OFs) have also been reported, 24,25 featuring high processing speeds of up to 40-Gb/s. This approach, however, works only for a fixed differentiation order and lacks reconfigurability, whereas in practical applications, processing systems with variable differentiation orders are desired to meet diverse computing requirements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, photonic DIFF can be mainly divided into two categories, the field DIFF and the intensity DIFF [6]. The intensity DIFF means both input signals and output differentiated signals are carried by the optical intensity or optical power regardless of signal phase, which is useful for ultra-wideband (UWB) microwave communications [7][8][9] and signal encoding [10]. Previously, we achieved such DIFFs by nonlinear effects of semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) [8,11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, we achieved such DIFFs by nonlinear effects of semiconductor optical amplifiers (SOAs) [8,11]. The intensity DIFF could be also implemented by incoherent photonic processors [12] and highly nonlinear fibers [7], and so forth. On the other hand, the field DIFF means the output optical field (complex signal, including both amplitude and phase) is the differentiation of input field signals, which has potential applications in ultrashort pulse generation [3,13], odd-symmetry Hermite-Gaussian waveform generation [2], and pulse edge recognition [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%