2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.01.058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High Response Rates to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in High-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The accuracy rate of UCP (80.9%) and UCU (83.1%) patients with cT3 disease was high (Table 2). As the 5‐year cancer‐specific survival rate for advanced UTUC patients is poor (<50% for pT2–3 patients, <10% for pT4 patients), neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is considered for patients with NOC disease 5,16–19 . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial to patients receiving cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, as it avoids loss of renal function after a nephroureterectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy rate of UCP (80.9%) and UCU (83.1%) patients with cT3 disease was high (Table 2). As the 5‐year cancer‐specific survival rate for advanced UTUC patients is poor (<50% for pT2–3 patients, <10% for pT4 patients), neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy is considered for patients with NOC disease 5,16–19 . Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is beneficial to patients receiving cisplatin‐based chemotherapy, as it avoids loss of renal function after a nephroureterectomy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the observations and results obtained through neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the treatment of bladder carcinoma, several retrospective studies have investigated the role of neoadjuvant therapy in UTUC. Utilizing preoperative cisplatin-based chemotherapy, pathological downstaging as well as lower recurrence rates and better outcomes have been observed (14,(89)(90)(91)(92). To date, no prospective trial has been published on this topic.…”
Section: Utuc In 2020mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity existed among studies based on Cochran Q statistics (P=0.036) and I 2 =34.7%. In addition, pPR rate was displayed in 10 studies (13,(19)(20)(21)23,25,28,29,31,32). After analyzing data from the 10 studies, the pooled pPR rate was 40% (95% CI: 0.32-0.49; P<0.001), which revealed that about 4 in ten patients with UTUC treated with NAC can achieve pPR (Figure 3B).…”
Section: Dfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Characteristics and details of included studies CSS, cancer-specific survival; PFS, progression-free survival; DFS, disease-free survival; pCR, pathological complete response pPR, pathological partial response. NA, not available GCarbo , gemcitabine and carboplatin; MVAC, methotrexate; vinblastine; doxorubicin; and cisplatin; GC, gemcitabine and cisplatin; MEP, methotrexate, etoposide, and cisplatin; MEC, methotrexate, etoposide and etoposide; MVEC, methotrexate, vinblastine, etoposide and cisplatin; GCI, gemcitabine and cisplatin, and ifosfamide; d-MVDC, dose dense methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin and cisplatin.OSIn total, 9 included studies reported the OS results(14,(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25). After pooling the data across the 9 studies, we obtained the results were HR 2.14 (95% CI: 1.75-2.63; P<0.001), which represented a 2.14 times OS benefit in UTUC patients undergoing NAC following surgery compared to surgery alone (Figure2A).…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%