2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.tecto.2022.229228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High-resolution Vs tomography of South China by joint inversion of body wave and surface wave data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
29
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
4
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, our results (Figure 9c) are significantly different from the results of these two studies (Figures 9a and 9e) in the crust, as we demonstrate the existence of MCLVZs. Gao2022 (Figure 9a) and Shen2016 (Figure 9e) have almost the same characteristics in the crust, although Gao et al (2022) introduced earthquake body wave data during the shear-wave velocity inversion. The reason for this is that long-period body wave data cannot strongly constrain the shallow velocity We chose a northern subarea (Figure 10a) to further explain how higher-mode dispersion curves impact the shear-wave velocity inversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, our results (Figure 9c) are significantly different from the results of these two studies (Figures 9a and 9e) in the crust, as we demonstrate the existence of MCLVZs. Gao2022 (Figure 9a) and Shen2016 (Figure 9e) have almost the same characteristics in the crust, although Gao et al (2022) introduced earthquake body wave data during the shear-wave velocity inversion. The reason for this is that long-period body wave data cannot strongly constrain the shallow velocity We chose a northern subarea (Figure 10a) to further explain how higher-mode dispersion curves impact the shear-wave velocity inversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gao2022 (Figure 9a) and Shen2016 (Figure 9e) have almost the same characteristics in the crust, although Gao et al. (2022) introduced earthquake body wave data during the shear‐wave velocity inversion. The reason for this is that long‐period body wave data cannot strongly constrain the shallow velocity structure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen (2017) determined the Vs model of continental China by inverting the surface wave dispersion curves from Shen et al (2016) by the conventional surface wave tomography. From the Vs model of Chen (2017), Gao et al (2022) first calculated the Vp model via the Vp-Vs relationship of Brocher (2005) and then used them as initial models to invert coarse Vp and Vs models with a horizontal grid interval of 1.0 𝐴𝐴 • and a coarse grid in depth by double-difference seismic travel time tomography. We interpolated the velocity models to a finer grid with a horizontal interval of 0.5° and varying intervals in the vertical direction, which were subsequently used as initial models for the joint inversion.…”
Section: Inversion Details and Resolution Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then we conducted trade‐off analysis near the reference weights (Figure 6) and chose the optimal data weights as 40 and 45, respectively. During this process, the smoothing parameters η1 ${\eta }_{\mathit{1}}$ and η2 ${\eta }_{\mathit{2}}$ are the same as those selected for joint inversion of surface wave and body wave data using the same datasets (Gao et al., 2022). Appropriate damping parameter is selected so that the joint inversion system has a proper condition number of 100–200 (Zhang et al., 2014).…”
Section: Application To South Chinamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, to improve the stability and accuracy of the (Sun et al, 2013). (d) Vertical shear-wave velocity section along the MT profile (Gao et al, 2022), the white dotted line shows the fluctuation in the Moho depth (He et al, 2014).…”
Section: Sensitivity Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%