2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2010.05.050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

High performance PEEK/carbon nanotube composites compatibilized with polysulfones-II. Mechanical and electrical properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
109
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
12
109
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It appears that the disadvantages of the compatibilization with respect to SWCNT conductivity are outweighed by the enhanced dispersion and adhesion attained in the presence of the polysulfone; overall, the electrical conductivity attained in the laminates reinforced with wrapped SWCNTs is on average one order of magnitude higher than that obtained for the non-compatibilized samples. This is in contrast with the results obtained from the previous study of PEEK/SWCNT composites [28], where the incorporation of the compatibilizer maintained the level of conductivity of the samples. The discrepancy could be attributed to the influence of additional factors, such as the presence of nanoscale pores.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Measurementscontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…It appears that the disadvantages of the compatibilization with respect to SWCNT conductivity are outweighed by the enhanced dispersion and adhesion attained in the presence of the polysulfone; overall, the electrical conductivity attained in the laminates reinforced with wrapped SWCNTs is on average one order of magnitude higher than that obtained for the non-compatibilized samples. This is in contrast with the results obtained from the previous study of PEEK/SWCNT composites [28], where the incorporation of the compatibilizer maintained the level of conductivity of the samples. The discrepancy could be attributed to the influence of additional factors, such as the presence of nanoscale pores.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Measurementscontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…The aforementioned effect has been previously reported for PEEK/CNF composites [24] and was attributed to a more inhomogeneous amorphous phase in the composites in relation to the pure matrix. It is worthy to note that the trends observed from the DMA spectra of the different laminates are consistent with those described previously for PEEK/SWCNT and PEEK/SWCNT + PEES composites [28], where the compatibilized samples, in particular those including laser-grown CNTs, exhibited the highest E 0 and T g values. These results Table 3 -Storage modulus E 0 at 25, 100 and 200°C, glass transition temperature T g , tan d maximum value and width at half maximum b for the different PEEK laminates, obtained from dynamic mechanical analysis measurements at a frequency of 1 Hz.…”
Section: Dynamic Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations