2018
High Lithium Ion Conductivity LiF/GO Solid Electrolyte Interphase Inhibiting the Shuttle of Lithium Polysulfides in Long‐Life Li–S Batteries
Abstract: The “shuttle effect” that stems from the dissolution of polysulfides is the most fatal issue affecting the cycle life of lithium‐sulfur (Li–S) batteries. In order to suppress the “shuttle effect,” a new strategy of using a highly lithium ion conductive lithium fluoride/graphene oxide (LiF/GO) solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) to mechanically prevent the lithium dendrite breakthrough is reported. When utilized in Li–S batteries, the LiF/GO SEI coated separator demonstrates significant feature in mitigating the…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
110
16
11
1
Citation Types
1
71
0
0
Year Published
2018
2026
Publication Types
Select...
135
1
1
Relationship
9
128
Authors
Journals
Cited by 137 publications
(72 citation statements)
References 41 publications
1
71
0
0
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Similarly, Li 2 S 6 solution with Li 0.66 VS 2 showed almost the same transparent color as that of VS 2 , which indicates that there is a strong trapping capacity of Li 0.66 VS 2 with Li 2 S 6 . [26,37,38] This phenomenon is further verified by the UV-vis spectrum. As can be seen from the Figure 2c, the absorption peak of Li 2 S 6 in the visible range disappears after adding VS 2 and Li 0.66 VS 2 , indicating that the concentration of Li 2 S 6 solution decreased significantly after the interaction with VS 2 and Li 0.66 VS 2 , which is in sharp contrast to the situation of blank solution.…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Interaction Between LI X Vs 2 And Lips
supporting
confidence: 56%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Similarly, Li 2 S 6 solution with Li 0.66 VS 2 showed almost the same transparent color as that of VS 2 , which indicates that there is a strong trapping capacity of Li 0.66 VS 2 with Li 2 S 6 . [26,37,38] This phenomenon is further verified by the UV-vis spectrum. As can be seen from the Figure 2c, the absorption peak of Li 2 S 6 in the visible range disappears after adding VS 2 and Li 0.66 VS 2 , indicating that the concentration of Li 2 S 6 solution decreased significantly after the interaction with VS 2 and Li 0.66 VS 2 , which is in sharp contrast to the situation of blank solution.…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Interaction Between LI X Vs 2 And Lips
supporting
confidence: 56%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…The SEM image of asprepared LiF-coated Li exhibited some cracks (Figure 3a), whereas the CIF-coated Li surface remained dense, uniform, and intact, even after a bending treatment (Figure 3b). This results proved that although LiF worked well during the electrochemical measurement, 23,57 it was fragile, not to mention the harsher winding and scratching during battery processing. A further study of the mechanical strength to accommodate the battery technology is an interesting topic that will be conducted in the future.…”
Section: Methods
mentioning
confidence: 67%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) spectra of the cathodes were further compared before and after 200 cycles at 0.2 C. Before cycling, the Nyquist plots (Figure e) and corresponding equivalent circuits (Figure S11) suggest that all three cathodes have charge-transfer resistance (R2, the depressed semicircle at high frequency), whereas only the S–V 2 O 3 @C@G cathode has another small interface contact resistance of the electrode bulk (R3, the depressed semicircle at middle frequency) owing to the poor conductivity of V 2 O 3 . After 200 cycles, the second semicircle in the S–V 2 O 3 @C@G cathode becomes more obvious (Figure f), which is mainly ascribed to the undesirable interface contact resistance originating from the uncontrolled deposition of insulating Li 2 S or Li 2 S 2 on the lithium anode during cycling . In contrast, S–V 2 O 3 /V 8 C 7 @C@G and S–V 8 C 7 @C@G retain one semicircle, indicating that Li 2 S or Li 2 S 2 deposits less on the lithium anode.…”
Section: Results
mentioning
confidence: 94%
